GDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

9F has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat 9F's return on equity of 0.22%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 57.92%. On the other hand 9F has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12672.51%. Given that 9F has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe 9F is more attractive than GDS Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.254, which suggesting that the stock is 74.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.634%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. 9F pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than 9F quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than 9F's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while 9F's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.51x versus 0.02x for 9F. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 57.92%. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.254, which suggesting that the stock is 74.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.51x versus 0.26x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -15.94%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -31.89%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 57.92%. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.18 which suggests that it could grow by 30.81%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.254, which suggesting that the stock is 74.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 2.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.689%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $270.8M. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$43.2M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.51x versus 2.91x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 28.02% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -10.58%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 19.57% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 1.99%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 57.92%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $12.42 which suggests that it could grow by 101.91%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than GDS Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.254, which suggesting that the stock is 74.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.311%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays 1.58% of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $308.8M. GDS Holdings's net income of $104.9M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$32.7M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.99x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 3.51x versus 1.45x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.