TRMLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 11.73% compared to Tourmaline Oil's net margin of 8.8%. Tourmaline Oil's return on equity of 8.4% beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 24.76%.

Tourmaline Oil has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.05%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tourmaline Oil has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe Tourmaline Oil is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

Tourmaline Oil has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tourmaline Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tourmaline Oil pays 93.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tourmaline Oil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tourmaline Oil quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $127.7M. Tourmaline Oil's net income of $147.9M is higher than Greenfire Resources's net income of $11.2M. Notably, Tourmaline Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.88x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 2.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tourmaline Oil is 3.97x versus 0.53x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 11.73% compared to Tourmaline Oil's net margin of -11.31%. Tourmaline Oil's return on equity of 8.4% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -3.92%.

Tourmaline Oil has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.05%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.52 which suggests that it could grow by 37.89%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than Tourmaline Oil, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than Tourmaline Oil.

Tourmaline Oil has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.709, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.147%.

Tourmaline Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tourmaline Oil pays 93.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tourmaline Oil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tourmaline Oil quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $170.5M. Tourmaline Oil's net income of $147.9M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, Tourmaline Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.88x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tourmaline Oil is 3.97x versus 0.25x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunshine Oilsands has a net margin of 11.73% compared to Tourmaline Oil's net margin of -9.69%. Tourmaline Oil's return on equity of 8.4% beat Sunshine Oilsands's return on equity of -43.12%.

Tourmaline Oil has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.05%. On the other hand Sunshine Oilsands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tourmaline Oil has higher upside potential than Sunshine Oilsands, analysts believe Tourmaline Oil is more attractive than Sunshine Oilsands.

Tourmaline Oil has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunshine Oilsands has a beta of -4,504.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 450547.875%.

Tourmaline Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Sunshine Oilsands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tourmaline Oil pays 93.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunshine Oilsands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tourmaline Oil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tourmaline Oil quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Sunshine Oilsands quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Tourmaline Oil's net income of $147.9M is higher than Sunshine Oilsands's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Tourmaline Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.88x while Sunshine Oilsands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tourmaline Oil is 3.97x versus 0.50x for Sunshine Oilsands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zenith Energy has a net margin of 11.73% compared to Tourmaline Oil's net margin of --. Tourmaline Oil's return on equity of 8.4% beat Zenith Energy's return on equity of -44.35%.

Tourmaline Oil has a consensus price target of $63.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.05%. On the other hand Zenith Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tourmaline Oil has higher upside potential than Zenith Energy, analysts believe Tourmaline Oil is more attractive than Zenith Energy.

Tourmaline Oil has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zenith Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tourmaline Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Zenith Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tourmaline Oil pays 93.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Zenith Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tourmaline Oil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tourmaline Oil quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Zenith Energy quarterly revenues of --. Tourmaline Oil's net income of $147.9M is higher than Zenith Energy's net income of --. Notably, Tourmaline Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.88x while Zenith Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tourmaline Oil is 3.97x versus 49.55x for Zenith Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.