FECOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of -- compared to FEC Resources's net margin of 8.8%. FEC Resources's return on equity of -- beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 24.76%.

FEC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FEC Resources has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe FEC Resources is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

FEC Resources has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FEC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FEC Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FEC Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $127.7M. FEC Resources's net income of -$57K is lower than Greenfire Resources's net income of $11.2M. Notably, FEC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.20x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 2.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FEC Resources is -- versus 0.56x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of -- compared to FEC Resources's net margin of -11.31%. FEC Resources's return on equity of -- beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -3.92%.

FEC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 35.67%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than FEC Resources, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than FEC Resources.

FEC Resources has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.808, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.173%.

FEC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FEC Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FEC Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $170.5M. FEC Resources's net income of -$57K is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, FEC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.20x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FEC Resources is -- versus 0.25x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunshine Oilsands has a net margin of -- compared to FEC Resources's net margin of -9.69%. FEC Resources's return on equity of -- beat Sunshine Oilsands's return on equity of -43.12%.

FEC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunshine Oilsands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FEC Resources has higher upside potential than Sunshine Oilsands, analysts believe FEC Resources is more attractive than Sunshine Oilsands.

FEC Resources has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunshine Oilsands has a beta of -4,470.513, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 447151.289%.

FEC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunshine Oilsands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FEC Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunshine Oilsands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FEC Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sunshine Oilsands quarterly revenues of $3.8M. FEC Resources's net income of -$57K is higher than Sunshine Oilsands's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, FEC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.20x while Sunshine Oilsands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FEC Resources is -- versus 0.50x for Sunshine Oilsands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zenith Energy has a net margin of -- compared to FEC Resources's net margin of --. FEC Resources's return on equity of -- beat Zenith Energy's return on equity of -44.35%.

FEC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zenith Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FEC Resources has higher upside potential than Zenith Energy, analysts believe FEC Resources is more attractive than Zenith Energy.

FEC Resources has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zenith Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FEC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zenith Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FEC Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zenith Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FEC Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zenith Energy quarterly revenues of --. FEC Resources's net income of -$57K is higher than Zenith Energy's net income of --. Notably, FEC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.20x while Zenith Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FEC Resources is -- versus 57.60x for Zenith Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.