TNTFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airbus SE has a net margin of -2.78% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of 6.27%. PostNL NV's return on equity of 9.78% beat Airbus SE's return on equity of 18.68%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Airbus SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than Airbus SE.

PostNL NV has a beta of 0.911, which suggesting that the stock is 8.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airbus SE has a beta of 1.502, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.172%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. Airbus SE offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. PostNL NV pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE pays out 37.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $830.4M, which are smaller than Airbus SE quarterly revenues of $17.3B. PostNL NV's net income of -$23.1M is lower than Airbus SE's net income of $1.1B. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while Airbus SE's PE ratio is 35.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.15x versus 1.74x for Airbus SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICTS International NV has a net margin of -2.78% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of --. PostNL NV's return on equity of 9.78% beat ICTS International NV's return on equity of --.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICTS International NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than ICTS International NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than ICTS International NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of 0.911, which suggesting that the stock is 8.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICTS International NV has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.291%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. ICTS International NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PostNL NV pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PostNL NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $830.4M, which are larger than ICTS International NV quarterly revenues of --. PostNL NV's net income of -$23.1M is higher than ICTS International NV's net income of --. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while ICTS International NV's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.15x versus 0.41x for ICTS International NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Randstad NV has a net margin of -2.78% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of 1.76%. PostNL NV's return on equity of 9.78% beat Randstad NV's return on equity of 9.97%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Randstad NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than Randstad NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of 0.911, which suggesting that the stock is 8.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Randstad NV has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.01%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. Randstad NV offers a yield of 5.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. PostNL NV pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Randstad NV pays out 84.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $830.4M, which are smaller than Randstad NV quarterly revenues of $6.6B. PostNL NV's net income of -$23.1M is lower than Randstad NV's net income of $116.6M. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while Randstad NV's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.15x versus 0.28x for Randstad NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of -2.78% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of --. PostNL NV's return on equity of 9.78% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 58.17%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of 0.911, which suggesting that the stock is 8.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.47%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. PostNL NV pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 46.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $830.4M, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. PostNL NV's net income of -$23.1M is higher than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.15x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 36.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.15x versus 6.49x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.