SYBJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BDO Unibank has a net margin of 21.02% compared to Security Bank's net margin of --. Security Bank's return on equity of 7.24% beat BDO Unibank's return on equity of --.

Security Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BDO Unibank has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Security Bank has higher upside potential than BDO Unibank, analysts believe Security Bank is more attractive than BDO Unibank.

Security Bank has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BDO Unibank has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.55%.

Security Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. BDO Unibank offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Security Bank pays 24.96% of its earnings as a dividend. BDO Unibank pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Security Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Security Bank quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are larger than BDO Unibank quarterly revenues of --. Security Bank's net income of $52.6M is higher than BDO Unibank's net income of --. Notably, Security Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while BDO Unibank's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security Bank is 1.31x versus 3.03x for BDO Unibank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a net margin of 21.02% compared to Security Bank's net margin of --. Security Bank's return on equity of 7.24% beat Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of --.

Security Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bounce Mobile Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Security Bank has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe Security Bank is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Security Bank has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.652%.

Security Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Bounce Mobile Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Security Bank pays 24.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Bounce Mobile Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Security Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Security Bank quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are larger than Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues of --. Security Bank's net income of $52.6M is higher than Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of --. Notably, Security Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Bounce Mobile Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security Bank is 1.31x versus -- for Bounce Mobile Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bank of the Philippine Islands has a net margin of 21.02% compared to Security Bank's net margin of 39.08%. Security Bank's return on equity of 7.24% beat Bank of the Philippine Islands's return on equity of 15.51%.

Security Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bank of the Philippine Islands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Security Bank has higher upside potential than Bank of the Philippine Islands, analysts believe Security Bank is more attractive than Bank of the Philippine Islands.

Security Bank has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of the Philippine Islands has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.315%.

Security Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Bank of the Philippine Islands offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Security Bank pays 24.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of the Philippine Islands pays out 31.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Security Bank quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are smaller than Bank of the Philippine Islands quarterly revenues of $778.9M. Security Bank's net income of $52.6M is lower than Bank of the Philippine Islands's net income of $304.4M. Notably, Security Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Bank of the Philippine Islands's PE ratio is 9.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security Bank is 1.31x versus 3.54x for Bank of the Philippine Islands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metropolitan Bank & Trust has a net margin of 21.02% compared to Security Bank's net margin of 30.45%. Security Bank's return on equity of 7.24% beat Metropolitan Bank & Trust's return on equity of 12.56%.

Security Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metropolitan Bank & Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Security Bank has higher upside potential than Metropolitan Bank & Trust, analysts believe Security Bank is more attractive than Metropolitan Bank & Trust.

Security Bank has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metropolitan Bank & Trust has a beta of 0.416, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.413%.

Security Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.32%. Metropolitan Bank & Trust offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Security Bank pays 24.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Metropolitan Bank & Trust pays out 32.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Security Bank quarterly revenues are $250.2M, which are smaller than Metropolitan Bank & Trust quarterly revenues of $695.6M. Security Bank's net income of $52.6M is lower than Metropolitan Bank & Trust's net income of $211.8M. Notably, Security Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Metropolitan Bank & Trust's PE ratio is 7.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Security Bank is 1.31x versus 2.43x for Metropolitan Bank & Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.