BNCM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hennessy Advisors has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of 26.52%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat Hennessy Advisors's return on equity of 7.95%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hennessy Advisors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 97.92%. Given that Hennessy Advisors has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe Hennessy Advisors is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hennessy Advisors has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.265%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hennessy Advisors offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hennessy Advisors pays out 58.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hennessy Advisors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hennessy Advisors quarterly revenues of $8.8M. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than Hennessy Advisors's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hennessy Advisors's PE ratio is 13.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 3.13x for Hennessy Advisors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of -7.31%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.231%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 1.31x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of 28.82%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.33%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 5.43x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of 33.77%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.72%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $115.79 which suggests that it could fall by -1.1%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 1.607, which suggesting that the stock is 60.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.235%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 62.71% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $603M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 12.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 3.79x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.