BNCM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of 1.3%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $82.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.18%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 0.186, which suggesting that the stock is 81.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.21099999999999%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 1.16x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

B. Riley Financial has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of -14.33%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat B. Riley Financial's return on equity of -37.71%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand B. Riley Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 923.89%. Given that B. Riley Financial has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe B. Riley Financial is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 0.186, which suggesting that the stock is 81.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.523%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. B. Riley Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial pays out -149.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than B. Riley Financial quarterly revenues of $343M. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than B. Riley Financial's net income of -$49.2M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while B. Riley Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 0.06x for B. Riley Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of 27.48%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $89.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 0.186, which suggesting that the stock is 81.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.863%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 19.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 5.42x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of -- compared to Bounce Mobile Systems's net margin of 27.81%. Bounce Mobile Systems's return on equity of -- beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.15 which suggests that it could fall by -2.03%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Bounce Mobile Systems, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Bounce Mobile Systems.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a beta of 0.186, which suggesting that the stock is 81.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.452%.

Bounce Mobile Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Bounce Mobile Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bounce Mobile Systems quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Bounce Mobile Systems's net income of -- is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Bounce Mobile Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bounce Mobile Systems is -- versus 3.01x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.