SUCEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nippon Steel has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net margin of 5.47%. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's return on equity of 4.53% beat Nippon Steel's return on equity of 6.01%.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Steel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sumitomo Osaka Cement has higher upside potential than Nippon Steel, analysts believe Sumitomo Osaka Cement is more attractive than Nippon Steel.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Steel has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.307%.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Nippon Steel offers a yield of 5.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Sumitomo Osaka Cement pays 44.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Steel pays out 46.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement quarterly revenues are $377.3M, which are smaller than Nippon Steel quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net income of $37.6M is lower than Nippon Steel's net income of $778.4M. Notably, Sumitomo Osaka Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.65x while Nippon Steel's PE ratio is 9.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo Osaka Cement is 0.60x versus 0.36x for Nippon Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oji Holdings has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net margin of 5.66%. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's return on equity of 4.53% beat Oji Holdings's return on equity of 3.98%.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oji Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sumitomo Osaka Cement has higher upside potential than Oji Holdings, analysts believe Sumitomo Osaka Cement is more attractive than Oji Holdings.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oji Holdings has a beta of -0.027, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.666%.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Oji Holdings offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Sumitomo Osaka Cement pays 44.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Oji Holdings pays out 42.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement quarterly revenues are $377.3M, which are smaller than Oji Holdings quarterly revenues of $3B. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net income of $37.6M is lower than Oji Holdings's net income of $170.9M. Notably, Sumitomo Osaka Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.65x while Oji Holdings's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo Osaka Cement is 0.60x versus 0.38x for Oji Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shin-Etsu Chemical has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net margin of --. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's return on equity of 4.53% beat Shin-Etsu Chemical's return on equity of --.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shin-Etsu Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sumitomo Osaka Cement has higher upside potential than Shin-Etsu Chemical, analysts believe Sumitomo Osaka Cement is more attractive than Shin-Etsu Chemical.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shin-Etsu Chemical has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.77%.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Shin-Etsu Chemical offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Sumitomo Osaka Cement pays 44.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Shin-Etsu Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement quarterly revenues are $377.3M, which are larger than Shin-Etsu Chemical quarterly revenues of --. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net income of $37.6M is higher than Shin-Etsu Chemical's net income of --. Notably, Sumitomo Osaka Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.65x while Shin-Etsu Chemical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo Osaka Cement is 0.60x versus 5.44x for Shin-Etsu Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyobo has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net margin of 0.58%. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's return on equity of 4.53% beat Toyobo's return on equity of 0.85%.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyobo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sumitomo Osaka Cement has higher upside potential than Toyobo, analysts believe Sumitomo Osaka Cement is more attractive than Toyobo.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyobo has a beta of -0.083, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.302%.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.11%. Toyobo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sumitomo Osaka Cement pays 44.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyobo pays out 175.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Toyobo's is not.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement quarterly revenues are $377.3M, which are smaller than Toyobo quarterly revenues of $688.8M. Sumitomo Osaka Cement's net income of $37.6M is higher than Toyobo's net income of $4M. Notably, Sumitomo Osaka Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.65x while Toyobo's PE ratio is 45.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sumitomo Osaka Cement is 0.60x versus 0.22x for Toyobo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.