SRHBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MoneyHero has a net margin of -- compared to StarHub's net margin of 27.32%. StarHub's return on equity of 21.56% beat MoneyHero's return on equity of -273.52%.

StarHub has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MoneyHero has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that StarHub has higher upside potential than MoneyHero, analysts believe StarHub is more attractive than MoneyHero.

StarHub has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MoneyHero has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

StarHub has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. MoneyHero offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. StarHub pays 57.75% of its earnings as a dividend. MoneyHero pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. StarHub's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

StarHub quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MoneyHero quarterly revenues of $20.9M. StarHub's net income of -- is lower than MoneyHero's net income of $5.7M. Notably, StarHub's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while MoneyHero's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for StarHub is 0.92x versus 0.49x for MoneyHero. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mega Matrix has a net margin of -- compared to StarHub's net margin of -26.8%. StarHub's return on equity of 21.56% beat Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45%.

StarHub has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mega Matrix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.48%. Given that Mega Matrix has higher upside potential than StarHub, analysts believe Mega Matrix is more attractive than StarHub.

StarHub has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.911, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.071%.

StarHub has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Mega Matrix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. StarHub pays 57.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. StarHub's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

StarHub quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mega Matrix quarterly revenues of $10.3M. StarHub's net income of -- is lower than Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, StarHub's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while Mega Matrix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for StarHub is 0.92x versus 2.00x for Mega Matrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sound Group has a net margin of -- compared to StarHub's net margin of --. StarHub's return on equity of 21.56% beat Sound Group's return on equity of -13.16%.

StarHub has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sound Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 595.98%. Given that Sound Group has higher upside potential than StarHub, analysts believe Sound Group is more attractive than StarHub.

StarHub has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sound Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

StarHub has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Sound Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. StarHub pays 57.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sound Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. StarHub's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

StarHub quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sound Group quarterly revenues of --. StarHub's net income of -- is lower than Sound Group's net income of --. Notably, StarHub's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while Sound Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for StarHub is 0.92x versus 0.05x for Sound Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JOYY has a net margin of -- compared to StarHub's net margin of 10.84%. StarHub's return on equity of 21.56% beat JOYY's return on equity of 3.84%.

StarHub has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JOYY has an analysts' consensus of $41.26 which suggests that it could grow by 0.63%. Given that JOYY has higher upside potential than StarHub, analysts believe JOYY is more attractive than StarHub.

StarHub has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.647% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JOYY has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.348%.

StarHub has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. JOYY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. StarHub pays 57.75% of its earnings as a dividend. JOYY pays out 27.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

StarHub quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JOYY quarterly revenues of $558.7M. StarHub's net income of -- is lower than JOYY's net income of $60.6M. Notably, StarHub's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while JOYY's PE ratio is 2.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for StarHub is 0.92x versus 1.16x for JOYY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.