FNGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mega Matrix has a net margin of -19.77% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of -26.8%. FingerMotion's return on equity of -32.5% beat Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Mega Matrix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.48%. Given that FingerMotion has higher upside potential than Mega Matrix, analysts believe FingerMotion is more attractive than Mega Matrix.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.214, which suggesting that the stock is 78.551% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.911, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.071%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mega Matrix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than Mega Matrix quarterly revenues of $10.3M. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mega Matrix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 1.86x versus 2.00x for Mega Matrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sound Group has a net margin of -19.77% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of --. FingerMotion's return on equity of -32.5% beat Sound Group's return on equity of -13.16%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Sound Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 595.98%. Given that Sound Group has higher upside potential than FingerMotion, analysts believe Sound Group is more attractive than FingerMotion.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.214, which suggesting that the stock is 78.551% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sound Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sound Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sound Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than Sound Group quarterly revenues of --. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Sound Group's net income of --. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sound Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 1.86x versus 0.05x for Sound Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

StarHub has a net margin of -19.77% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of --. FingerMotion's return on equity of -32.5% beat StarHub's return on equity of 21.56%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand StarHub has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FingerMotion has higher upside potential than StarHub, analysts believe FingerMotion is more attractive than StarHub.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.214, which suggesting that the stock is 78.551% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison StarHub has a beta of 0.294, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.647%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. StarHub offers a yield of 5.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. StarHub pays out 57.75% of its earnings as a dividend. StarHub's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than StarHub quarterly revenues of --. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is higher than StarHub's net income of --. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while StarHub's PE ratio is 14.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 1.86x versus 0.92x for StarHub. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JOYY has a net margin of -19.77% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of 10.84%. FingerMotion's return on equity of -32.5% beat JOYY's return on equity of 3.84%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand JOYY has an analysts' consensus of $41.26 which suggests that it could grow by 0.63%. Given that FingerMotion has higher upside potential than JOYY, analysts believe FingerMotion is more attractive than JOYY.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.214, which suggesting that the stock is 78.551% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JOYY has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.348%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JOYY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JOYY pays out 27.9% of its earnings as a dividend. JOYY's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than JOYY quarterly revenues of $558.7M. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is lower than JOYY's net income of $60.6M. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JOYY's PE ratio is 2.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 1.86x versus 1.16x for JOYY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.