PROSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AFC Ajax NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of --. Prosus NV's return on equity of 26.43% beat AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AFC Ajax NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prosus NV has higher upside potential than AFC Ajax NV, analysts believe Prosus NV is more attractive than AFC Ajax NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AFC Ajax NV has a beta of -0.116, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.574%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. AFC Ajax NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Prosus NV pays 2.17% of its earnings as a dividend. AFC Ajax NV pays out -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues of --. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than AFC Ajax NV's net income of --. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while AFC Ajax NV's PE ratio is 8.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 21.65x versus 1.21x for AFC Ajax NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Koninklijke KPN NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of 16.51%. Prosus NV's return on equity of 26.43% beat Koninklijke KPN NV's return on equity of 46.96%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Koninklijke KPN NV has an analysts' consensus of $3.60 which suggests that it could fall by -25.62%. Given that Koninklijke KPN NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe Koninklijke KPN NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koninklijke KPN NV has a beta of 0.330, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.028%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Koninklijke KPN NV offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Prosus NV pays 2.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke KPN NV pays out 76.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Koninklijke KPN NV quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Koninklijke KPN NV's net income of $244.4M. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Koninklijke KPN NV's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 21.65x versus 3.29x for Koninklijke KPN NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of -205.43%. Prosus NV's return on equity of 26.43% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of -12.93%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $66.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.59%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.817%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prosus NV pays 2.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $55.3M. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$113.6M. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 21.65x versus 77.82x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Music Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Prosus NV's net margin of --. Prosus NV's return on equity of 26.43% beat Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 57.01%.

Prosus NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Music Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prosus NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Prosus NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Prosus NV has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prosus NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.19%. Universal Music Group NV offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Prosus NV pays 2.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV pays out 44.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prosus NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Prosus NV's net income of -- is lower than Universal Music Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Prosus NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Universal Music Group NV's PE ratio is 26.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prosus NV is 21.65x versus 4.54x for Universal Music Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.