AFCJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of -205.43%. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of -12.93%.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $52.33 which suggests that it could grow by 32.16%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than AFC Ajax NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than AFC Ajax NV.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of -0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.105%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $55.3M. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$113.6M. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 59.32x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prosus NV has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of --. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat Prosus NV's return on equity of 18.13%.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prosus NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AFC Ajax NV has higher upside potential than Prosus NV, analysts believe AFC Ajax NV is more attractive than Prosus NV.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of -0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prosus NV has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.359%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prosus NV offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV pays out 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Prosus NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Prosus NV quarterly revenues of --. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than Prosus NV's net income of --. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Prosus NV's PE ratio is 14.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 21.81x for Prosus NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasus Tel has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of --. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat Pegasus Tel's return on equity of --.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pegasus Tel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AFC Ajax NV has higher upside potential than Pegasus Tel, analysts believe AFC Ajax NV is more attractive than Pegasus Tel.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of -0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasus Tel has a beta of -2.305, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 330.494%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasus Tel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasus Tel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pegasus Tel quarterly revenues of --. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than Pegasus Tel's net income of --. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Pegasus Tel's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 1,750.79x for Pegasus Tel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Music Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to AFC Ajax NV's net margin of --. AFC Ajax NV's return on equity of -3.98% beat Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 57.01%.

AFC Ajax NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Music Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AFC Ajax NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe AFC Ajax NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

AFC Ajax NV has a beta of -0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 111.978% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AFC Ajax NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Music Group NV offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. AFC Ajax NV pays -4.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV pays out 44.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AFC Ajax NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues of --. AFC Ajax NV's net income of -- is lower than Universal Music Group NV's net income of --. Notably, AFC Ajax NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Universal Music Group NV's PE ratio is 26.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AFC Ajax NV is 1.21x versus 4.62x for Universal Music Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.