Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Sell
40
NABZY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.67
Seasonality move
:
2.71%
Day range:
$11.60 - $12.13
52-week range:
$9.83 - $14.06
Dividend yield:
4.73%
P/E ratio:
15.77x
P/S ratio:
5.61x
P/B ratio:
1.68x
Volume:
158.5K
Avg. volume:
113.3K
1-year change:
12.56%
Market cap:
$71.6B
Revenue:
$13.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.74
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$54.8M | -$0.07 | 190.35% | -6.46% | $20.45 |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank
|
$11.65 | -- | $71.6B | 15.77x | $0.27 | 4.73% | 5.61x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
$1.30 | -- | $868.3M | -- | $0.06 | 9.3% | 0.71x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$11.81 | $20.45 | $2.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.93x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
$0.26 | -- | $121.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1,369.20x |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
$7.28 | -- | $380M | 5.21x | $0.15 | 3.46% | 2.96x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank
|
77.71% | 1.074 | 185.56% | 11.92x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
27.58% | 0.238 | 59.97% | 1.31x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
-- | 8.875 | -- | 0.84x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 11.94x |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
9.65% | -0.076 | 11.84% | 60.33x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NABZY
National Australia Bank
|
-- | -- | 2.76% | 11.29% | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -5.94% | -8.25% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$46.7M | -$39.1M | -9.17% | -10.49% | -92.59% | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -38.32% | -38.32% | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | 19.33% | 20.17% | -- | -- |
National Australia Bank vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or IOOFF?
Insignia Financial has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Insignia Financial's return on equity of -8.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B IOOFFInsignia Financial-- -- $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand Insignia Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Insignia Financial, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Insignia Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank0 0 0 IOOFFInsignia Financial0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or IOOFF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insignia Financial has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Insignia Financial offers a yield of 9.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Insignia Financial pays out -55.91% of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or IOOFF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Insignia Financial quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Insignia Financial's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Insignia Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.61x versus 0.71x for Insignia Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank5.61x 15.77x -- -- IOOFFInsignia Financial0.71x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of -95.07%. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat IREN's return on equity of -10.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B IRENIREN85.8% -$0.27 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or IREN?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.45 which suggests that it could grow by 73.2%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than National Australia Bank, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than National Australia Bank.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank0 0 0 IRENIREN8 2 0 -
Is NABZY or IREN More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or IREN?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or IREN?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $54.4M. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of -$51.7M. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.61x versus 7.93x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank5.61x 15.77x -- -- IRENIREN7.93x -- $54.4M -$51.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or PTMGF?
Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank0 0 0 PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or PTMGF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or PTMGF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.61x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank5.61x 15.77x -- -- PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or SORHF?
Strategic Elements has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or SORHF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand Strategic Elements has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Strategic Elements.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank0 0 0 SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or SORHF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or SORHF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Strategic Elements offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Elements pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Australia Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or SORHF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Elements quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Elements's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Strategic Elements's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.61x versus 1,369.20x for Strategic Elements. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank5.61x 15.77x -- -- SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NABZY or TSRUF?
Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -- compared to National Australia Bank's net margin of --. National Australia Bank's return on equity of 11.29% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NABZYNational Australia Bank-- -- $191.3B TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M -
What do Analysts Say About NABZY or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that National Australia Bank has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe National Australia Bank is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NABZYNational Australia Bank0 0 0 TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 -
Is NABZY or TSRUF More Risky?
National Australia Bank has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NABZY or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. National Australia Bank pays 67.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NABZY or TSRUF?
National Australia Bank quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. National Australia Bank's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, National Australia Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 5.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Australia Bank is 5.61x versus 2.96x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NABZYNational Australia Bank5.61x 15.77x -- -- TSRUFPacific Current Group2.96x 5.21x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
