MPNGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Meituan's net margin of 3.35%. Meituan's return on equity of 15.39% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Meituan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 87.03%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Meituan, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Meituan.

Meituan has a beta of 0.349, which suggesting that the stock is 65.105% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.319%.

Meituan has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Meituan pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meituan quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Meituan's net income of $1.8B is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Meituan's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.22x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meituan is 2.84x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Meituan's net margin of 19.76%. Meituan's return on equity of 15.39% beat H World Group's return on equity of 29.15%.

Meituan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.55 which suggests that it could grow by 31.39%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than Meituan, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than Meituan.

Meituan has a beta of 0.349, which suggesting that the stock is 65.105% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.132%.

Meituan has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Meituan pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meituan quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than H World Group quarterly revenues of $899.7M. Meituan's net income of $1.8B is higher than H World Group's net income of $177.8M. Notably, Meituan's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.22x while H World Group's PE ratio is 20.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meituan is 2.84x versus 3.43x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Meituan's net margin of -13.73%. Meituan's return on equity of 15.39% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

Meituan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.99%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Meituan, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Meituan.

Meituan has a beta of 0.349, which suggesting that the stock is 65.105% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.749%.

Meituan has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meituan pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meituan quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Meituan's net income of $1.8B is higher than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Meituan's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.22x while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 57.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meituan is 2.84x versus 0.60x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Meituan's net margin of 42.62%. Meituan's return on equity of 15.39% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Meituan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.01 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than Meituan, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than Meituan.

Meituan has a beta of 0.349, which suggesting that the stock is 65.105% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.53%.

Meituan has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meituan pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meituan quarterly revenues are $13.1B, which are larger than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Meituan's net income of $1.8B is higher than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, Meituan's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.22x while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 21.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meituan is 2.84x versus 6.92x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.