KNDI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of 5.54%. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 428.99%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 236.39%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Commercial Vehicle Group, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Commercial Vehicle Group.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.083%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $171.8M. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.83x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 2.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.60x versus 0.07x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of 10.97%. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.73%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 428.99%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.54%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.519%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $503.8M. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.83x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 22.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.60x versus 2.09x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of --. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 428.99%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.54%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.83x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.60x versus 276.79x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phinia has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of 3.7%. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat Phinia's return on equity of 5.89%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 428.99%. On the other hand Phinia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.04%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Phinia, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Phinia.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phinia has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phinia offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phinia pays out 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Phinia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are smaller than Phinia quarterly revenues of $839M. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Phinia's net income of $31M. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.83x while Phinia's PE ratio is 20.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.60x versus 0.64x for Phinia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.