MHVYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 5.2% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of 5.8%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.02% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.46%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.027%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $426.1M is higher than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.01x while Kubota's PE ratio is 7.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 2.49x versus 0.64x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.2% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of -3.6%. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.02% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.97 which suggests that it could grow by 1.89%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.401%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $426.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.01x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 100.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 2.49x versus 1.24x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.2% compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net margin of --. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's return on equity of 10.02% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 0.506, which suggesting that the stock is 49.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries pays 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's net income of $426.1M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.01x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 2.49x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.