MCCK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Griffon has a net margin of -- compared to Mestek's net margin of 9.28%. Mestek's return on equity of -- beat Griffon's return on equity of 105.75%.

Mestek has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Griffon has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 34.31%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Mestek, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Mestek.

Mestek has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.327%.

Mestek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Griffon offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Mestek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mestek quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Griffon quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Mestek's net income of -- is lower than Griffon's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Mestek's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Griffon's PE ratio is 14.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mestek is 0.84x versus 1.35x for Griffon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of -- compared to Mestek's net margin of 4.53%. Mestek's return on equity of -- beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 2.06%.

Mestek has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $33.75 which suggests that it could grow by 79.43%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Mestek, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Mestek.

Mestek has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.171%.

Mestek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Mestek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mestek quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Mestek's net income of -- is lower than Quanex Building Products's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Mestek's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 31.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mestek is 0.84x versus 0.50x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Mestek's net margin of -484.97%. Mestek's return on equity of -- beat Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67%.

Mestek has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safe & Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26356.97%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Mestek, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Mestek.

Mestek has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.944, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.416%.

Mestek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mestek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mestek quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $566.4K. Mestek's net income of -- is lower than Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Mestek's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safe & Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mestek is 0.84x versus 0.58x for Safe & Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of -- compared to Mestek's net margin of -18.28%. Mestek's return on equity of -- beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Mestek has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mestek has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Mestek is more attractive than Techprecision.

Mestek has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.447% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.217, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.286%.

Mestek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mestek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mestek quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Mestek's net income of -- is lower than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Mestek's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mestek is 0.84x versus 0.97x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.