AP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Janus International Group has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of 5.13%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of 5.98% beat Janus International Group's return on equity of 9.48%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.92%. On the other hand Janus International Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.70 which suggests that it could grow by 18.73%. Given that Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher upside potential than Janus International Group, analysts believe Ampco-Pittsburgh is more attractive than Janus International Group.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.795% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus International Group has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.406%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Janus International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $104.3M, which are smaller than Janus International Group quarterly revenues of $210.5M. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of $1.1M is lower than Janus International Group's net income of $10.8M. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.45x while Janus International Group's PE ratio is 23.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.14x versus 1.27x for Janus International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of 4.53%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of 5.98% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 2.06%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.92%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $33.75 which suggests that it could grow by 75.14%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Ampco-Pittsburgh, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.795% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.171%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $104.3M, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of $1.1M is lower than Quanex Building Products's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.45x while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 32.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.14x versus 0.52x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Holdings has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -484.97%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of 5.98% beat Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.92%. On the other hand Safe & Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27643.53%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Ampco-Pittsburgh, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.795% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.944, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.416%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $104.3M, which are larger than Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $566.4K. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of $1.1M is higher than Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.45x while Safe & Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.14x versus 0.55x for Safe & Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of 1.1% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -18.28%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of 5.98% beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.92%. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Ampco-Pittsburgh is more attractive than Techprecision.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.795% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.217, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.286%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $104.3M, which are larger than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of $1.1M is higher than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.45x while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.14x versus 0.94x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.