Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
39
LQWC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0100
Seasonality move
:
-13.07%
Day range:
$0.0058 - $0.0064
52-week range:
$0.0049 - $0.0300
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.23x
Volume:
11K
Avg. volume:
28.8K
1-year change:
-62.35%
Market cap:
$774.3K
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$403.4M | $0.52 | -0.15% | 25.03% | $34.83 |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
$77.1M | $0.08 | 6.21% | -- | -- |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
$0.0064 | -- | $774.3K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$39.21 | $34.83 | $3.3B | 18.24x | $0.05 | 0.26% | 1.97x |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
$0.02 | -- | $133.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
$0.0045 | -- | $1.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
$5.89 | -- | $121.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.42x |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
$305.00 | -- | $304.6M | -- | $10.00 | 3.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -7.755 | -- | -- |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
72.94% | 1.278 | 19.05% | 1.23x |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | 2.091 | -- | -- |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | 3.886 | -- | -- |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
53.79% | -1.392 | 44.74% | 1.44x |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -0.336 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQWC
LifeQuest World
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies
|
$111.3M | $55.1M | 24.82% | 141.7% | 15.88% | $54.3M |
|
DGWR
Deep Green Waste & Recycling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EAWD
Energy And Water Development
|
-- | -$492.7K | -- | -- | -- | -$177.3K |
|
QRHC
Quest Resource Holding
|
$11.7M | -$940.3K | -5.91% | -12% | -1.29% | -$823.7K |
|
SCPJ
Scope Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
LifeQuest World vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LQWC or ATMU?
Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to LifeQuest World's net margin of 10.85%. LifeQuest World's return on equity of -- beat Atmus Filtration Technologies's return on equity of 141.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies27.57% $0.52 $817.5M -
What do Analysts Say About LQWC or ATMU?
LifeQuest World has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atmus Filtration Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $34.83 which suggests that it could grow by 19.5%. Given that Atmus Filtration Technologies has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more attractive than LifeQuest World.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies4 0 0 -
Is LQWC or ATMU More Risky?
LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.362% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQWC or ATMU?
LifeQuest World has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atmus Filtration Technologies offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. LifeQuest World pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQWC or ATMU?
LifeQuest World quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Atmus Filtration Technologies quarterly revenues of $403.7M. LifeQuest World's net income of -- is lower than Atmus Filtration Technologies's net income of $43.8M. Notably, LifeQuest World's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Atmus Filtration Technologies's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeQuest World is -- versus 1.97x for Atmus Filtration Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -- ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies1.97x 18.24x $403.7M $43.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQWC or DGWR?
Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a net margin of -- compared to LifeQuest World's net margin of --. LifeQuest World's return on equity of -- beat Deep Green Waste & Recycling's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQWC or DGWR?
LifeQuest World has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Deep Green Waste & Recycling has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LifeQuest World has higher upside potential than Deep Green Waste & Recycling, analysts believe LifeQuest World is more attractive than Deep Green Waste & Recycling.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling0 0 0 -
Is LQWC or DGWR More Risky?
LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.362% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.503%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQWC or DGWR?
LifeQuest World has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deep Green Waste & Recycling offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeQuest World pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deep Green Waste & Recycling pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQWC or DGWR?
LifeQuest World quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Deep Green Waste & Recycling quarterly revenues of --. LifeQuest World's net income of -- is lower than Deep Green Waste & Recycling's net income of --. Notably, LifeQuest World's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Deep Green Waste & Recycling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeQuest World is -- versus 0.03x for Deep Green Waste & Recycling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -- DGWRDeep Green Waste & Recycling0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LQWC or EAWD?
Energy And Water Development has a net margin of -- compared to LifeQuest World's net margin of --. LifeQuest World's return on equity of -- beat Energy And Water Development's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQWC or EAWD?
LifeQuest World has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy And Water Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LifeQuest World has higher upside potential than Energy And Water Development, analysts believe LifeQuest World is more attractive than Energy And Water Development.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 EAWDEnergy And Water Development0 0 0 -
Is LQWC or EAWD More Risky?
LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.362% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy And Water Development has a beta of -399.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40092.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQWC or EAWD?
LifeQuest World has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy And Water Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeQuest World pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy And Water Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQWC or EAWD?
LifeQuest World quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues of --. LifeQuest World's net income of -- is lower than Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K. Notably, LifeQuest World's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy And Water Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeQuest World is -- versus -- for Energy And Water Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -- EAWDEnergy And Water Development-- -- -- -$840.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns LQWC or QRHC?
Quest Resource Holding has a net margin of -- compared to LifeQuest World's net margin of -4.65%. LifeQuest World's return on equity of -- beat Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- QRHCQuest Resource Holding16.08% -$0.16 $135.8M -
What do Analysts Say About LQWC or QRHC?
LifeQuest World has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.59%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than LifeQuest World.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 QRHCQuest Resource Holding0 0 0 -
Is LQWC or QRHC More Risky?
LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.362% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.620, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.984%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQWC or QRHC?
LifeQuest World has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Resource Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeQuest World pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQWC or QRHC?
LifeQuest World quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues of $72.8M. LifeQuest World's net income of -- is lower than Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, LifeQuest World's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Resource Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeQuest World is -- versus 0.42x for Quest Resource Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -- QRHCQuest Resource Holding0.42x -- $72.8M -$3.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQWC or SCPJ?
Scope Industries has a net margin of -- compared to LifeQuest World's net margin of --. LifeQuest World's return on equity of -- beat Scope Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- SCPJScope Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQWC or SCPJ?
LifeQuest World has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Scope Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LifeQuest World has higher upside potential than Scope Industries, analysts believe LifeQuest World is more attractive than Scope Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQWCLifeQuest World0 0 0 SCPJScope Industries0 0 0 -
Is LQWC or SCPJ More Risky?
LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.362% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scope Industries has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.176%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQWC or SCPJ?
LifeQuest World has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scope Industries offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share. LifeQuest World pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scope Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQWC or SCPJ?
LifeQuest World quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Scope Industries quarterly revenues of --. LifeQuest World's net income of -- is lower than Scope Industries's net income of --. Notably, LifeQuest World's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scope Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeQuest World is -- versus -- for Scope Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQWCLifeQuest World-- -- -- -- SCPJScope Industries-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 11.44% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 2.75% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 1.05% over the past day.
