Is MSTR Stock Fundamentally Misunderstood?
Software firm turned Bitcoin treasury Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) has made waves…
Buy
60
IMBBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$39.35
Seasonality move
:
-0.52%
Day range:
$39.08 - $39.48
52-week range:
$25.25 - $42.43
Dividend yield:
5.57%
P/E ratio:
10.20x
P/S ratio:
0.82x
P/B ratio:
5.02x
Volume:
70.9K
Avg. volume:
115.4K
1-year change:
54.31%
Market cap:
$32.2B
Revenue:
$41.1B
EPS (TTM):
$3.86
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $38.00 |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $46.90 |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$5.4B | -- | -- | -- | $90.99 |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
$4.2B | -- | -- | -- | $124.57 |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$17.3B | -- | -- | -- | $70.21 |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
$68M | -$0.09 | -- | -- | $3.98 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
$39.35 | $38.00 | $32.2B | 10.20x | $0.51 | 5.57% | 0.82x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
$48.60 | $46.90 | $106.6B | 28.54x | $0.80 | 6.27% | 3.29x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$93.53 | $90.99 | $42.8B | 28.33x | $0.89 | 2.33% | 1.97x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
$107.31 | $124.57 | $59.6B | 16.63x | $1.62 | 3.86% | 2.96x |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$62.94 | $70.21 | $154.4B | 25.62x | $0.52 | 3.08% | 2.42x |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
$2.36 | $3.98 | $290.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.94x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
67.89% | -0.222 | 43.33% | 0.29x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
42.28% | 0.331 | 56.73% | 0.38x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
55.58% | 0.101 | 30.78% | 0.57x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
67.87% | -0.071 | 29.86% | 0.65x |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
59.34% | 0.000 | 21.22% | 0.54x |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
20.1% | -0.252 | 29.71% | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
|
-- | -- | 16.48% | 45.97% | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | 3.34% | 5.79% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
-- | -- | 7.24% | 16.39% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | 10.69% | 29.79% | -- | -- |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | -- | 14.06% | 26% | -- | -- |
|
WALD
Waldencast PLC
|
-- | -- | -4.62% | -5.64% | -- | -- |
Imperial Brands PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or BTI?
British American Tobacco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 45.97% beat British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of 5.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $20.7B BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC-- -- $108.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.43%. On the other hand British American Tobacco PLC has an analysts' consensus of $46.90 which suggests that it could fall by -3.49%. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has more downside risk than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Imperial Brands PLC is more attractive than British American Tobacco PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 2 0 BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC1 2 1 -
Is IMBBY or BTI More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.458, which suggesting that the stock is 54.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.678%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.57%. British American Tobacco PLC offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco PLC pays out 169.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but British American Tobacco PLC's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or BTI?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than British American Tobacco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while British American Tobacco PLC's PE ratio is 28.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 3.29x for British American Tobacco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 10.20x -- -- BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC3.29x 28.54x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 45.97% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 16.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $20.7B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.43%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $90.99 which suggests that it could fall by -2.71%. Given that Imperial Brands PLC has more downside risk than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 2 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC7 4 1 -
Is IMBBY or CCEP More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.458, which suggesting that the stock is 54.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.079%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.57%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 64.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or CCEP?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 28.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 1.97x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 10.20x -- -- CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC1.97x 28.33x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or DEO?
Diageo PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 45.97% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 29.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $20.7B DEODiageo PLC-- -- $34.1B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.43%. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $124.57 which suggests that it could grow by 16.09%. Given that Diageo PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Diageo PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 2 0 DEODiageo PLC3 2 1 -
Is IMBBY or DEO More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.458, which suggesting that the stock is 54.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.82%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.57%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or DEO?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 16.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 2.96x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 10.20x -- -- DEODiageo PLC2.96x 16.63x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or UL?
Unilever PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 45.97% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $20.7B ULUnilever PLC-- -- $53.8B -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.43%. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of $70.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.56%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 2 0 ULUnilever PLC2 1 0 -
Is IMBBY or UL More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.458, which suggesting that the stock is 54.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.387%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.57%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or UL?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 2.42x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 10.20x -- -- ULUnilever PLC2.42x 25.62x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMBBY or WALD?
Waldencast PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 45.97% beat Waldencast PLC's return on equity of -5.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMBBYImperial Brands PLC-- -- $20.7B WALDWaldencast PLC-- -- $896.6M -
What do Analysts Say About IMBBY or WALD?
Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.43%. On the other hand Waldencast PLC has an analysts' consensus of $3.98 which suggests that it could grow by 68.64%. Given that Waldencast PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Waldencast PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0 2 0 WALDWaldencast PLC4 2 0 -
Is IMBBY or WALD More Risky?
Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.458, which suggesting that the stock is 54.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waldencast PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMBBY or WALD?
Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.57%. Waldencast PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Waldencast PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMBBY or WALD?
Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Waldencast PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Waldencast PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Waldencast PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.82x versus 0.94x for Waldencast PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMBBYImperial Brands PLC0.82x 10.20x -- -- WALDWaldencast PLC0.94x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet or Amazon the Better Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) are two of the mega-cap…
Why Did Ken Griffin Buy Sweetgreen Stock?
In Q1, Ken Griffin’s Citadel Advisors purchased nearly 1.3 million…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
83
SMR alert for Jun 13
NuScale Power [SMR] is down 2.96% over the past day.
Sell
20
KARO alert for Jun 13
Karooooo [KARO] is down 20.19% over the past day.
Sell
18
OXM alert for Jun 13
Oxford Industries [OXM] is down 13.91% over the past day.
