BTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Altria Group has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of 42.91%. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5% beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.96%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.23%. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has higher upside potential than Altria Group, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Altria Group.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.096%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.28%. Altria Group offers a yield of 7.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 83.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $5.3B. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Altria Group's net income of $2.3B. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Altria Group's PE ratio is 9.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.47x versus 4.56x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of 31.1%. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5% beat Philip Morris International's return on equity of --.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.96%. On the other hand Philip Morris International has an analysts' consensus of $108.09 which suggests that it could grow by 10.78%. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.475%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.28%. Philip Morris International offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Philip Morris International quarterly revenues of $9.9B. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Philip Morris International's PE ratio is 19.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.47x versus 5.14x for Philip Morris International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of --. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5% beat Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.96%. On the other hand Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.003%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.28%. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays out 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.47x versus 2.40x for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unilever PLC has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of --. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.96%. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.75%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than British American Tobacco PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than British American Tobacco PLC.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.979%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.28%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 20.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.47x versus 2.22x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.