IHICY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of 9.55% compared to IHI's net margin of -1471.96%. IHI's return on equity of 23.7% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

IHI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHI has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe IHI is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

IHI has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 45.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4451.471%.

IHI has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IHI pays 13.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IHI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IHI quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. IHI's net income of $245.7M is higher than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, IHI's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHI is 1.60x versus 0.81x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of 9.55% compared to IHI's net margin of 5.8%. IHI's return on equity of 23.7% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

IHI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.02%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than IHI, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than IHI.

IHI has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.027%.

IHI has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. IHI pays 13.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IHI quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. IHI's net income of $245.7M is lower than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, IHI's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHI is 1.60x versus 0.65x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 9.55% compared to IHI's net margin of -3.6%. IHI's return on equity of 23.7% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

IHI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $12.32 which suggests that it could grow by 3.11%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than IHI, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than IHI.

IHI has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.401%.

IHI has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. IHI pays 13.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. IHI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

IHI quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. IHI's net income of $245.7M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, IHI's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 102.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHI is 1.60x versus 1.26x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 9.55% compared to IHI's net margin of --. IHI's return on equity of 23.7% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

IHI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHI has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe IHI is more attractive than LogProstyle.

IHI has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

IHI has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IHI pays 13.44% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IHI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IHI quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. IHI's net income of $245.7M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, IHI's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHI is 1.60x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.