EJPRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of -1471.96%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that East Japan Railway has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe East Japan Railway is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.708% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 44.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4354.363%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.03x versus 22.60x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of 6.75%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.38%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than East Japan Railway, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than East Japan Railway.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.708% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.058%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 22.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.03x versus 0.67x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of 7.38%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.22%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than East Japan Railway, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than East Japan Railway.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.708% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.095%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Kyocera's net income of $236M. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.03x versus 1.01x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to East Japan Railway's net margin of 5.34%. East Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

East Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 104.84%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than East Japan Railway, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than East Japan Railway.

East Japan Railway has a beta of 0.383, which suggesting that the stock is 61.708% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

East Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. East Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

East Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. East Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, East Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 12.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for East Japan Railway is 1.03x versus 2.47x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.