Financhill
Sell
47

CWPWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.07
Seasonality move :
3.3%
Day range:
$0.07 - $0.07
52-week range:
$0.05 - $0.10
Dividend yield:
6.38%
P/E ratio:
5.01x
P/S ratio:
1.65x
P/B ratio:
0.46x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
667
1-year change:
-16.77%
Market cap:
$550.2M
Revenue:
$341.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.01

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
-- -- -- -- --
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
$0.07 -- $550.2M 5.01x $0.00 6.38% 1.65x
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
$0.24 -- $1B 4.21x $0.01 5.9% 0.54x
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
$8.28 -- $20.9B 14.15x $0.08 4.88% 1.79x
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
$37.07 -- $12.8B 6.49x $1.32 5.93% 0.91x
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
$6.32 -- $13.5B 17.44x $0.26 5.69% 15.49x
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
65.02% -0.956 355.84% 0.60x
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
79.58% 0.160 531.02% 0.65x
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
38.51% 0.081 38.67% 0.43x
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
63.41% 0.034 188.83% 0.52x
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
2.8% -0.278 2.17% 0.68x
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
-- 0.000 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
-- -- 3.15% 9.28% -- --
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
-- -- 3.2% 14.22% -- --
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
-- -- 6.85% 10.61% -- --
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
-- -- 5.05% 13.16% -- --
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
-- -- 6.78% 7% -- --
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
-- -- -- -- -- --

Concord New Energy Group vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CWPWF or CGEGF?

    CGN New Energy Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 9.28% beat CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    -- -- $3.4B
    CGEGF
    CGN New Energy Holdings
    -- -- $8.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CWPWF or CGEGF?

    Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    0 0 0
    CGEGF
    CGN New Energy Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CWPWF or CGEGF More Risky?

    Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWPWF or CGEGF?

    Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. CGN New Energy Holdings offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings pays out 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CWPWF or CGEGF?

    Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.01x while CGN New Energy Holdings's PE ratio is 4.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.65x versus 0.54x for CGN New Energy Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    1.65x 5.01x -- --
    CGEGF
    CGN New Energy Holdings
    0.54x 4.21x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CWPWF or CLPHY?

    CLP Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 9.28% beat CLP Holdings's return on equity of 10.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    -- -- $3.4B
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings
    -- -- $22.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CWPWF or CLPHY?

    Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CLP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than CLP Holdings, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than CLP Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    0 0 0
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CWPWF or CLPHY More Risky?

    Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.306%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWPWF or CLPHY?

    Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. CLP Holdings offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. CLP Holdings pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CWPWF or CLPHY?

    Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CLP Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than CLP Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.01x while CLP Holdings's PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.65x versus 1.79x for CLP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    1.65x 5.01x -- --
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings
    1.79x 14.15x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CWPWF or CRPJY?

    China Resources Power Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 9.28% beat China Resources Power Holdings's return on equity of 13.16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    -- -- $3.4B
    CRPJY
    China Resources Power Holdings
    -- -- $40B
  • What do Analysts Say About CWPWF or CRPJY?

    Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    0 0 0
    CRPJY
    China Resources Power Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CWPWF or CRPJY More Risky?

    Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.511%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWPWF or CRPJY?

    Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. China Resources Power Holdings offers a yield of 5.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings pays out 50.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CWPWF or CRPJY?

    Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.01x while China Resources Power Holdings's PE ratio is 6.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.65x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    1.65x 5.01x -- --
    CRPJY
    China Resources Power Holdings
    0.91x 6.49x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CWPWF or HGKGY?

    Power Assets Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 9.28% beat Power Assets Holdings's return on equity of 7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    -- -- $3.4B
    HGKGY
    Power Assets Holdings
    -- -- $11.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CWPWF or HGKGY?

    Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    0 0 0
    HGKGY
    Power Assets Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CWPWF or HGKGY More Risky?

    Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.511%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWPWF or HGKGY?

    Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. Power Assets Holdings offers a yield of 5.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings pays out 98.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CWPWF or HGKGY?

    Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.01x while Power Assets Holdings's PE ratio is 17.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.65x versus 15.49x for Power Assets Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    1.65x 5.01x -- --
    HGKGY
    Power Assets Holdings
    15.49x 17.44x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CWPWF or PVLTF?

    Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 9.28% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    -- -- $3.4B
    PVLTF
    Beijing Energy International Holding
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CWPWF or PVLTF?

    Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    0 0 0
    PVLTF
    Beijing Energy International Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is CWPWF or PVLTF More Risky?

    Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWPWF or PVLTF?

    Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CWPWF or PVLTF?

    Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.01x while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.65x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group
    1.65x 5.01x -- --
    PVLTF
    Beijing Energy International Holding
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Microsoft Be a $5 Trillion Stock?
Will Microsoft Be a $5 Trillion Stock?

Microsoft’s market capitalization sits near $3.73 trillion today. To clear the…

Where Will C3.ai Stock Be in 1 Year?
Where Will C3.ai Stock Be in 1 Year?

C3 .ai (NYSE: AI) has been the poster child for “hype versus execution.”…

What Is the Ceiling for IONQ Stock?
What Is the Ceiling for IONQ Stock?

IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) is a quantum computing startup that, like many…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
58
INKT alert for Jul 12

MiNK Therapeutics [INKT] is up 727.94% over the past day.

Buy
51
NEGG alert for Jul 12

Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 74.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
ATRO alert for Jul 12

Astronics [ATRO] is up 16.28% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock