CWPWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CLP Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 11.41% beat CLP Holdings's return on equity of 6.75%.

Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CLP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than CLP Holdings, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than CLP Holdings.

Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.530, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.991%.

Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.96%. CLP Holdings offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. CLP Holdings pays out 115.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CLP Holdings's is not.

Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CLP Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than CLP Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.05x while CLP Holdings's PE ratio is 21.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.11x versus 1.85x for CLP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Resources Power Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 11.41% beat China Resources Power Holdings's return on equity of 13.24%.

Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings.

Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings has a beta of 0.502, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.812%.

Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.96%. China Resources Power Holdings offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings pays out 29.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.05x while China Resources Power Holdings's PE ratio is 6.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.11x versus 0.89x for China Resources Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Assets Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 11.41% beat Power Assets Holdings's return on equity of 6.89%.

Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings.

Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.363%.

Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.96%. Power Assets Holdings offers a yield of 5.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings pays out 100.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Power Assets Holdings's is not.

Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.05x while Power Assets Holdings's PE ratio is 18.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.11x versus 105.56x for Power Assets Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group's net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 11.41% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.

Concord New Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.

Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Concord New Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.96%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Concord New Energy Group pays 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.05x while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group is 1.11x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.