
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.21x | $0.01 | 5.9% | 0.54x |
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
$8.34 | -- | $21.1B | 14.15x | $0.08 | 4.84% | 1.79x |
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
$37.07 | -- | $12.8B | 6.49x | $1.32 | 5.93% | 0.91x |
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
$0.07 | -- | $550.2M | 5.01x | $0.00 | 6.38% | 1.65x |
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
$6.38 | -- | $13.6B | 17.44x | $0.26 | 5.64% | 15.65x |
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
79.58% | 0.160 | 531.02% | 0.65x |
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
38.51% | 0.081 | 38.67% | 0.43x |
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
63.41% | 0.034 | 188.83% | 0.52x |
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
65.02% | -0.956 | 355.84% | 0.60x |
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
2.8% | -0.278 | 2.17% | 0.68x |
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
-- | -- | 6.85% | 10.61% | -- | -- |
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
-- | -- | 3.15% | 9.28% | -- | -- |
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CLP Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CGN New Energy Holdings's net margin of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.22% beat CLP Holdings's return on equity of 10.61%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | $8.1B |
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
-- | -- | $22.6B |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CLP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGN New Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than CLP Holdings, analysts believe CGN New Energy Holdings is more attractive than CLP Holdings.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.306%.
CGN New Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. CLP Holdings offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CGN New Energy Holdings pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. CLP Holdings pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CLP Holdings quarterly revenues of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of -- is lower than CLP Holdings's net income of --. Notably, CGN New Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while CLP Holdings's PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGN New Energy Holdings is 0.54x versus 1.79x for CLP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0.54x | 4.21x | -- | -- |
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
1.79x | 14.15x | -- | -- |
China Resources Power Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CGN New Energy Holdings's net margin of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.22% beat China Resources Power Holdings's return on equity of 13.16%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | $8.1B |
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
-- | -- | $40B |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGN New Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings, analysts believe CGN New Energy Holdings is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.511%.
CGN New Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. China Resources Power Holdings offers a yield of 5.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. CGN New Energy Holdings pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings pays out 50.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings quarterly revenues of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings's net income of --. Notably, CGN New Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while China Resources Power Holdings's PE ratio is 6.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGN New Energy Holdings is 0.54x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0.54x | 4.21x | -- | -- |
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
0.91x | 6.49x | -- | -- |
Concord New Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to CGN New Energy Holdings's net margin of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.22% beat Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 9.28%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | $8.1B |
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
-- | -- | $3.4B |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Concord New Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGN New Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group, analysts believe CGN New Energy Holdings is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.179, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.135%.
CGN New Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Concord New Energy Group offers a yield of 6.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGN New Energy Holdings pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group pays out 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Concord New Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, CGN New Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while Concord New Energy Group's PE ratio is 5.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGN New Energy Holdings is 0.54x versus 1.65x for Concord New Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0.54x | 4.21x | -- | -- |
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
1.65x | 5.01x | -- | -- |
Power Assets Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CGN New Energy Holdings's net margin of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.22% beat Power Assets Holdings's return on equity of 7%.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | $8.1B |
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
-- | -- | $11.5B |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGN New Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings, analysts believe CGN New Energy Holdings is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.511%.
CGN New Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Power Assets Holdings offers a yield of 5.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CGN New Energy Holdings pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings pays out 98.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings quarterly revenues of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings's net income of --. Notably, CGN New Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while Power Assets Holdings's PE ratio is 17.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGN New Energy Holdings is 0.54x versus 15.65x for Power Assets Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0.54x | 4.21x | -- | -- |
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
15.65x | 17.44x | -- | -- |
Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to CGN New Energy Holdings's net margin of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.22% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | $8.1B |
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGN New Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe CGN New Energy Holdings is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
CGN New Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGN New Energy Holdings pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, CGN New Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.21x while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGN New Energy Holdings is 0.54x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
0.54x | 4.21x | -- | -- |
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…
If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Veritex Holdings [VBTX] is down 3.26% over the past day.
Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 8.6% over the past day.
Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 2.98% over the past day.