CJPRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Central Japan Railway's net margin of -1471.96%. Central Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Central Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Japan Railway has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Central Japan Railway is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Central Japan Railway has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 45.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4451.471%.

Central Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Central Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Central Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Central Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Central Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Japan Railway is 1.95x versus 0.81x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of -- compared to Central Japan Railway's net margin of 5.8%. Central Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Central Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 14.52%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Central Japan Railway, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Central Japan Railway.

Central Japan Railway has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.027%.

Central Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Central Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Central Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Central Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kubota's PE ratio is 7.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Japan Railway is 1.95x versus 0.63x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of -- compared to Central Japan Railway's net margin of -3.6%. Central Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Central Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $12.32 which suggests that it could grow by 5.28%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Central Japan Railway, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Central Japan Railway.

Central Japan Railway has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.401%.

Central Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Central Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Central Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Central Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Central Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kyocera's PE ratio is 100.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Japan Railway is 1.95x versus 1.23x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of -- compared to Central Japan Railway's net margin of --. Central Japan Railway's return on equity of -- beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Central Japan Railway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Japan Railway has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Central Japan Railway is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Central Japan Railway has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.811% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Central Japan Railway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Central Japan Railway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Central Japan Railway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Central Japan Railway's net income of -- is lower than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Central Japan Railway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Japan Railway is 1.95x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.