CICHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Highest Performances Holdings has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of --. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highest Performances Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 96.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.768%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highest Performances Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Highest Performances Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than Highest Performances Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.65x while Highest Performances Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.06x versus 0.30x for Highest Performances Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of --. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat The9's return on equity of --.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than The9.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 96.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.136%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.65x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.06x versus 0.03x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 49.91% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of 17.57%. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 10.29% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.24%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than China Construction Bank, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than China Construction Bank.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 96.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.923%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $25.6B, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. China Construction Bank's net income of $12.8B is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.65x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 40.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.06x versus 3.53x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.