BKFCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baiyu Holdings has a net margin of 38.38% compared to Bank of Communications's net margin of 9.52%. Bank of Communications's return on equity of 8.2% beat Baiyu Holdings's return on equity of 2.72%.

Bank of Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baiyu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of Communications has higher upside potential than Baiyu Holdings, analysts believe Bank of Communications is more attractive than Baiyu Holdings.

Bank of Communications has a beta of -0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baiyu Holdings has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.416%.

Bank of Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. Baiyu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bank of Communications pays 55.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Baiyu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Communications quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Baiyu Holdings quarterly revenues of $37.2M. Bank of Communications's net income of $3.5B is higher than Baiyu Holdings's net income of $3.5M. Notably, Bank of Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while Baiyu Holdings's PE ratio is 0.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Communications is 1.99x versus 0.04x for Baiyu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Construction Bank has a net margin of 38.38% compared to Bank of Communications's net margin of 43.85%. Bank of Communications's return on equity of 8.2% beat China Construction Bank's return on equity of 9.97%.

Bank of Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Construction Bank has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of Communications has higher upside potential than China Construction Bank, analysts believe Bank of Communications is more attractive than China Construction Bank.

Bank of Communications has a beta of -0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.143, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.713%.

Bank of Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. China Construction Bank offers a yield of 11.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Bank of Communications pays 55.76% of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank pays out 40.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Communications quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are smaller than China Construction Bank quarterly revenues of $26.1B. Bank of Communications's net income of $3.5B is lower than China Construction Bank's net income of $11.5B. Notably, Bank of Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while China Construction Bank's PE ratio is 5.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Communications is 1.99x versus 2.37x for China Construction Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 38.38% compared to Bank of Communications's net margin of --. Bank of Communications's return on equity of 8.2% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

Bank of Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of Communications has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Bank of Communications is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

Bank of Communications has a beta of -0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bank of Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bank of Communications pays 55.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Communications quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Bank of Communications's net income of $3.5B is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Bank of Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Communications is 1.99x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of 38.38% compared to Bank of Communications's net margin of --. Bank of Communications's return on equity of 8.2% beat The9's return on equity of --.

Bank of Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bank of Communications has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Bank of Communications is more attractive than The9.

Bank of Communications has a beta of -0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 138.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 1.820, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.998%.

Bank of Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bank of Communications pays 55.76% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Communications quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Bank of Communications's net income of $3.5B is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, Bank of Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.45x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Communications is 1.99x versus 2.97x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.