CFRUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Guess? has a net margin of -- compared to Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net margin of -3.17%. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's return on equity of 6.63% beat Guess?'s return on equity of 16.13%.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand Guess? has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 27.18%. Given that Guess? has higher upside potential than Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, analysts believe Guess? is more attractive than Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guess? has a beta of 1.896, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.603%.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Guess? offers a yield of 8.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA pays 87.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Guess? pays out 31.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guess? quarterly revenues of $738.5M. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net income of -- is lower than Guess?'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.09x while Guess?'s PE ratio is 12.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA is 4.02x versus 0.32x for Guess?. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of -- compared to Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net margin of 6.3%. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's return on equity of 6.63% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity of --.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand Garrett Motion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.45%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Garrett Motion has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.32%.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Garrett Motion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA pays 87.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Garrett Motion pays out 16.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Garrett Motion quarterly revenues of $826M. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net income of -- is lower than Garrett Motion's net income of $52M. Notably, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.09x while Garrett Motion's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA is 4.02x versus 0.59x for Garrett Motion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

On Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net margin of 4.8%. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's return on equity of 6.63% beat On Holding AG's return on equity of 10.8%.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand On Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of $59.91 which suggests that it could grow by 6.13%. Given that On Holding AG has higher upside potential than Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, analysts believe On Holding AG is more attractive than Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison On Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. On Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA pays 87.72% of its earnings as a dividend. On Holding AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than On Holding AG quarterly revenues of $735.2M. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net income of -- is lower than On Holding AG's net income of $35.3M. Notably, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.09x while On Holding AG's PE ratio is 130.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA is 4.02x versus 14.56x for On Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Swatch Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net margin of --. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's return on equity of 6.63% beat The Swatch Group AG's return on equity of 4.21%.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand The Swatch Group AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has higher upside potential than The Swatch Group AG, analysts believe Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA is more attractive than The Swatch Group AG.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.202% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Swatch Group AG has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.227%.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. The Swatch Group AG offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA pays 87.72% of its earnings as a dividend. The Swatch Group AG pays out 35.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Swatch Group AG quarterly revenues of --. Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's net income of -- is lower than The Swatch Group AG's net income of --. Notably, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 63.09x while The Swatch Group AG's PE ratio is 81.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA is 4.02x versus 5.78x for The Swatch Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.