GTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aptiv PLC has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -0.23%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 15.36%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.85%. On the other hand Aptiv PLC has an analysts' consensus of $74.89 which suggests that it could grow by 6.42%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Aptiv PLC, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Aptiv PLC.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 98.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.026%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Aptiv PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aptiv PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are smaller than Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than Aptiv PLC's net income of -$11M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while Aptiv PLC's PE ratio is 11.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.64x versus 0.88x for Aptiv PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dana has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 1.06%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Dana's return on equity of -2.06%.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.85%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $19.29 which suggests that it could grow by 11.29%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Dana, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Dana.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 98.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.836%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Dana offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are smaller than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than Dana's net income of $25M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while Dana's PE ratio is 147.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.64x versus 0.26x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -3528.43%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.85%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that Garrett Motion has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Garrett Motion is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 98.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.64x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OmniTek Engineering has a net margin of 7.06% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of -7.41%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -- beat OmniTek Engineering's return on equity of --.

Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.85%. On the other hand OmniTek Engineering has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3686.73%. Given that OmniTek Engineering has higher upside potential than Garrett Motion, analysts believe OmniTek Engineering is more attractive than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 98.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OmniTek Engineering has a beta of 0.043, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.718%.

Garrett Motion has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. OmniTek Engineering offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garrett Motion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OmniTek Engineering pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Garrett Motion quarterly revenues are $878M, which are larger than OmniTek Engineering quarterly revenues of $359.8K. Garrett Motion's net income of $62M is higher than OmniTek Engineering's net income of -$26.7K. Notably, Garrett Motion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while OmniTek Engineering's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garrett Motion is 0.64x versus 0.63x for OmniTek Engineering. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.