CDNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital Of North America's net margin of -6.69%. Consolidated Capital Of North America's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 48.92%.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $188.46 which suggests that it could grow by 8.27%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital Of North America, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Consolidated Capital Of North America.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a beta of 7.413, which suggesting that the stock is 641.331% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.39%.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Consolidated Capital Of North America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital Of North America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Consolidated Capital Of North America's net income of -- is lower than Expedia Group's net income of -$200M. Notably, Consolidated Capital Of North America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital Of North America is -- versus 1.70x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Business Travel Group has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital Of North America's net margin of 12.08%. Consolidated Capital Of North America's return on equity of -- beat Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -3.87%.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Business Travel Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.23 which suggests that it could grow by 42.21%. Given that Global Business Travel Group has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital Of North America, analysts believe Global Business Travel Group is more attractive than Consolidated Capital Of North America.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a beta of 7.413, which suggesting that the stock is 641.331% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Business Travel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Capital Of North America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Business Travel Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital Of North America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues of $621M. Consolidated Capital Of North America's net income of -- is lower than Global Business Travel Group's net income of $75M. Notably, Consolidated Capital Of North America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Business Travel Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital Of North America is -- versus 1.26x for Global Business Travel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital Of North America's net margin of 2.46%. Consolidated Capital Of North America's return on equity of -- beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 179.9%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital Of North America, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Consolidated Capital Of North America.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a beta of 7.413, which suggesting that the stock is 641.331% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Capital Of North America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital Of North America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $65.9M. Consolidated Capital Of North America's net income of -- is lower than Inspirato's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Consolidated Capital Of North America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital Of North America is -- versus 0.14x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Capital Of North America's net margin of 0.65%. Consolidated Capital Of North America's return on equity of -- beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.93%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital Of North America, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Consolidated Capital Of North America.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a beta of 7.413, which suggesting that the stock is 641.331% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.634%.

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Capital Of North America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Capital Of North America quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $179.7M. Consolidated Capital Of North America's net income of -- is lower than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Consolidated Capital Of North America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Capital Of North America is -- versus 0.95x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.