BYDDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of 5.37% compared to BYD's net margin of 2.51%. BYD's return on equity of 24.28% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.05%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $33.88 which suggests that it could grow by 14.81%. Given that Li Auto has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe Li Auto is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.129, which suggesting that the stock is 87.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $3.6B. BYD's net income of $1.3B is higher than Li Auto's net income of $89.4M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while Li Auto's PE ratio is 27.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.34x versus 1.56x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 5.37% compared to BYD's net margin of -36.2%. BYD's return on equity of 24.28% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.01 which suggests that it could grow by 40.32%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.129, which suggesting that the stock is 87.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.621, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.068%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. BYD's net income of $1.3B is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.34x versus 0.79x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 5.37% compared to BYD's net margin of 2.12%. BYD's return on equity of 24.28% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -13.04%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.129, which suggesting that the stock is 87.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. BYD's net income of $1.3B is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while Tesla's PE ratio is 189.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.34x versus 12.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 5.37% compared to BYD's net margin of -4.2%. BYD's return on equity of 24.28% beat XPeng's return on equity of -15.58%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $25.04 which suggests that it could grow by 27.56%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.129, which suggesting that the stock is 87.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $23.4B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. BYD's net income of $1.3B is higher than XPeng's net income of -$91.3M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.34x versus 2.68x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.