AUSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Power Group has a net margin of -32463.83% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of --. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat American Power Group's return on equity of --.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Power Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aura Systems has higher upside potential than American Power Group, analysts believe Aura Systems is more attractive than American Power Group.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.771% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Power Group has a beta of -1.303, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.261%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Power Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Power Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $47K, which are larger than American Power Group quarterly revenues of --. Aura Systems's net income of -$15.3M is higher than American Power Group's net income of --. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Power Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 241.02x versus 0.50x for American Power Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of -32463.83% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of 10.27%. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.14%.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.15%. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.771% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.11%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Electric offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 21.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $47K, which are smaller than Franklin Electric quarterly revenues of $531.4M. Aura Systems's net income of -$15.3M is lower than Franklin Electric's net income of $54.6M. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Electric's PE ratio is 25.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 241.02x versus 2.30x for Franklin Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings has a net margin of -32463.83% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of 9.69%. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 12.3%.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.65%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.771% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.551%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $47K, which are smaller than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Aura Systems's net income of -$15.3M is lower than Generac Holdings's net income of $113.7M. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 32.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 241.02x versus 2.27x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of -32463.83% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of 4.92%. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.33%.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.5%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.771% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.79900000000001%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out -161.67% of its earnings as a dividend.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $47K, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Aura Systems's net income of -$15.3M is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 50.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 241.02x versus 1.71x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.