AUSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Power Group has a net margin of -213000% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of --. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat American Power Group's return on equity of --.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Power Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aura Systems has higher upside potential than American Power Group, analysts believe Aura Systems is more attractive than American Power Group.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Power Group has a beta of -0.401, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.094%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Power Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Power Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $3K, which are larger than American Power Group quarterly revenues of --. Aura Systems's net income of -$540K is higher than American Power Group's net income of --. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Power Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 269.68x versus 0.41x for American Power Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of -213000% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of 6.8%. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.16%.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Electric has an analysts' consensus of $97.25 which suggests that it could grow by 12.57%. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.362%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Electric offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $3K, which are smaller than Franklin Electric quarterly revenues of $455.2M. Aura Systems's net income of -$540K is lower than Franklin Electric's net income of $31M. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Electric's PE ratio is 22.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 269.68x versus 1.98x for Franklin Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings has a net margin of -213000% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of 4.65%. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24%.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $152.01 which suggests that it could grow by 24.46%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.729, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.888%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $3K, which are smaller than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $942.1M. Aura Systems's net income of -$540K is lower than Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 21.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 269.68x versus 1.69x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of -213000% compared to Aura Systems's net margin of 4.04%. Aura Systems's return on equity of -- beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.67%.

Aura Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $162.82 which suggests that it could grow by 22.02%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Aura Systems has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.694%.

Aura Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Aura Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aura Systems quarterly revenues are $3K, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Aura Systems's net income of -$540K is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $57.3M. Notably, Aura Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 38.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aura Systems is 269.68x versus 1.51x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.