AOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aura Systems has a net margin of 14.17% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of -213000%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 27.66% beat Aura Systems's return on equity of --.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $75.43, signalling upside risk potential of 12.7%. On the other hand Aura Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A.O. Smith has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe A.O. Smith is more attractive than Aura Systems.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems has a beta of 0.864, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.616%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Aura Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A.O. Smith's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $963.9M, which are larger than Aura Systems quarterly revenues of $3K. A.O. Smith's net income of $136.6M is higher than Aura Systems's net income of -$540K. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while Aura Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 320.34x for Aura Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of 14.17% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 6.8%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 27.66% beat Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.16%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $75.43, signalling upside risk potential of 12.7%. On the other hand Franklin Electric has an analysts' consensus of $97.25 which suggests that it could grow by 12.98%. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than A.O. Smith, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than A.O. Smith.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.362%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Franklin Electric offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $963.9M, which are larger than Franklin Electric quarterly revenues of $455.2M. A.O. Smith's net income of $136.6M is higher than Franklin Electric's net income of $31M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while Franklin Electric's PE ratio is 22.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 1.98x for Franklin Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings has a net margin of 14.17% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 4.65%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 27.66% beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $75.43, signalling upside risk potential of 12.7%. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $154.62 which suggests that it could grow by 33.24%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than A.O. Smith, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than A.O. Smith.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.729, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.888%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A.O. Smith's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $963.9M, which are larger than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $942.1M. A.O. Smith's net income of $136.6M is higher than Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 20.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 1.61x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 14.17% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 4.04%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 27.66% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.67%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $75.43, signalling upside risk potential of 12.7%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $160.09 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than A.O. Smith, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than A.O. Smith.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.694%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $963.9M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.4B. A.O. Smith's net income of $136.6M is higher than Regal Rexnord's net income of $57.3M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.70x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 37.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 1.47x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.