Financhill
Buy
65

AETUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$22.41
Seasonality move :
-3.88%
Day range:
$22.37 - $22.61
52-week range:
$14.89 - $22.61
Dividend yield:
2.3%
P/E ratio:
13.86x
P/S ratio:
3.11x
P/B ratio:
2.32x
Volume:
4.6K
Avg. volume:
20.8K
1-year change:
29.59%
Market cap:
$13.1B
Revenue:
$4.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.62

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AETUF
ARC Resources
$1.1B $0.45 6.86% 43.31% $26.04
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- -- -- -- --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
-- $0.22 -- 121.33% --
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
-- -$0.23 -- -86.96% $6.58
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
-- -- -- -- --
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AETUF
ARC Resources
$22.41 $26.04 $13.1B 13.86x $0.13 2.3% 3.11x
FECOF
FEC Resources
$0.0058 -- $5M 0.20x $0.00 0% --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$5.12 -- $359.6M 2.75x $0.00 0% 0.63x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$6.12 $6.58 $216.2M 44.59x $0.00 0% 0.32x
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
$0.0439 -- $15M -- $0.00 0% 0.50x
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
$0.20 -- $93.4M -- $0.00 0% 61.94x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AETUF
ARC Resources
11.69% 0.286 7.04% 0.41x
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- 1.386 -- --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
28.23% 0.512 56.12% 1.37x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
64.13% 0.112 401.95% 0.37x
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
85.98% 3.955 1906.76% 0.01x
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
47.4% 19.402 600.09% 0.71x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AETUF
ARC Resources
$686.8M $404.6M 14.71% 17.14% 30.99% $389.7M
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- -$39.9K -- -- -- -$46.3K
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$56.5M $12M 16.83% 24.76% 16.44% $4.8M
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$98.3M $12.4M -1.49% -3.92% 2.16% $5.7M
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
-$1.4M -$5.1M -7.31% -43.12% 39.36% -$945.7K
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
-- -- -26.17% -44.35% -- --

ARC Resources vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or FECOF?

    FEC Resources has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of --. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat FEC Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    -- -$0.00 --
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.04, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand FEC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than FEC Resources, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than FEC Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or FECOF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.448, which suggesting that the stock is 55.151% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FEC Resources has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.673%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. FEC Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. FEC Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than FEC Resources quarterly revenues of --. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than FEC Resources's net income of -$57K. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while FEC Resources's PE ratio is 0.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 3.11x versus -- for FEC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    3.11x 13.86x $1.2B $281.4M
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    -- 0.20x -- -$57K
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or GFR?

    Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of 8.8%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 24.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    44.22% $0.16 $816M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.04, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    1 0 0
  • Is AETUF or GFR More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.448, which suggesting that the stock is 55.151% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $127.7M. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Greenfire Resources's net income of $11.2M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 2.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 3.11x versus 0.63x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    3.11x 13.86x $1.2B $281.4M
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    0.63x 2.75x $127.7M $11.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or GTE?

    Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of -11.31%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -3.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    57.66% -$0.54 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.04, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.58 which suggests that it could grow by 7.52%. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Gran Tierra Energy, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Gran Tierra Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    2 2 0
  • Is AETUF or GTE More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.448, which suggesting that the stock is 55.151% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.808, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.173%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $170.5M. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 3.11x versus 0.32x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    3.11x 13.86x $1.2B $281.4M
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    0.32x 44.59x $170.5M -$19.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or SUNYF?

    Sunshine Oilsands has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of -9.69%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Sunshine Oilsands's return on equity of -43.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    -28.82% -$0.02 $308.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.04, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand Sunshine Oilsands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Sunshine Oilsands, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Sunshine Oilsands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or SUNYF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.448, which suggesting that the stock is 55.151% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunshine Oilsands has a beta of -4,470.513, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 447151.289%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Sunshine Oilsands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunshine Oilsands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Sunshine Oilsands quarterly revenues of $3.8M. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Sunshine Oilsands's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Sunshine Oilsands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 3.11x versus 0.50x for Sunshine Oilsands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    3.11x 13.86x $1.2B $281.4M
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    0.50x -- $3.8M -$6.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or ZENAF?

    Zenith Energy has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of --. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Zenith Energy's return on equity of -44.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    ZENAF
    Zenith Energy
    -- -- $75.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or ZENAF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.04, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand Zenith Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Zenith Energy, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Zenith Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    ZENAF
    Zenith Energy
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or ZENAF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.448, which suggesting that the stock is 55.151% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zenith Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or ZENAF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Zenith Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Zenith Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or ZENAF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Zenith Energy quarterly revenues of --. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Zenith Energy's net income of --. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Zenith Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 3.11x versus 61.94x for Zenith Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    3.11x 13.86x $1.2B $281.4M
    ZENAF
    Zenith Energy
    61.94x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?

Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…

Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?
Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?

Last week, Senators Bernie Sanders and Angus King introduced a…

Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?
Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?

By every traditional yardstick, including a price‑to‑sales well above 100,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 14

VEON [VEON] is down 18.57% over the past day.

Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 14

Dave [DAVE] is down 12.68% over the past day.

Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 14

Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 9.12% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock