Financhill
Buy
59

AETUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$20.85
Seasonality move :
-1.88%
Day range:
$20.75 - $21.02
52-week range:
$14.89 - $21.71
Dividend yield:
2.47%
P/E ratio:
12.90x
P/S ratio:
2.89x
P/B ratio:
2.16x
Volume:
45.1K
Avg. volume:
20.3K
1-year change:
11.33%
Market cap:
$12.2B
Revenue:
$4.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.62

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AETUF
ARC Resources
$1.1B $0.45 5.66% 43.31% $26.01
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- -- -- -- --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
-- $0.22 -- 121.33% --
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
-- -$0.23 -- -86.96% $6.52
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
-- -- -- -- --
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AETUF
ARC Resources
$20.85 $26.01 $12.2B 12.90x $0.13 2.47% 2.89x
FECOF
FEC Resources
$0.0031 -- $2.6M 0.20x $0.00 0% --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$4.19 -- $294.3M 2.25x $0.00 0% 0.52x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$4.77 $6.52 $168.5M 44.59x $0.00 0% 0.25x
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
$0.0439 -- $15M -- $0.00 0% 0.50x
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
$0.18 -- $84M -- $0.00 0% 55.74x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AETUF
ARC Resources
11.69% -0.120 7.04% 0.41x
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- -0.165 -- --
GFR
Greenfire Resources
28.23% 1.106 56.12% 1.37x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
64.13% -0.037 401.95% 0.37x
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
85.98% 4.064 1906.76% 0.01x
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
47.4% 10.564 600.09% 0.71x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AETUF
ARC Resources
$686.8M $404.6M 14.71% 17.14% 30.99% $389.7M
FECOF
FEC Resources
-- -$39.9K -- -- -- -$46.3K
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$56.5M $12M 16.83% 24.76% 16.44% $4.8M
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$98.3M $12.4M -1.49% -3.92% 2.16% $5.7M
SUNYF
Sunshine Oilsands
-$1.4M -$5.1M -7.31% -43.12% 39.36% -$945.7K
ZENAF
Zenith Energy
-- -- -26.17% -44.35% -- --

ARC Resources vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or FECOF?

    FEC Resources has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of --. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat FEC Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    -- -$0.00 --
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.82%. On the other hand FEC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than FEC Resources, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than FEC Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or FECOF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.397, which suggesting that the stock is 60.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FEC Resources has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.235%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. FEC Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. FEC Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or FECOF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than FEC Resources quarterly revenues of --. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than FEC Resources's net income of -$57K. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.90x while FEC Resources's PE ratio is 0.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.89x versus -- for FEC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.89x 12.90x $1.2B $281.4M
    FECOF
    FEC Resources
    -- 0.20x -- -$57K
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or GFR?

    Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of 8.8%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 24.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    44.22% $0.16 $816M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.82%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    1 0 0
  • Is AETUF or GFR More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.397, which suggesting that the stock is 60.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or GFR?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $127.7M. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Greenfire Resources's net income of $11.2M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.90x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 2.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.89x versus 0.52x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.89x 12.90x $1.2B $281.4M
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    0.52x 2.25x $127.7M $11.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or GTE?

    Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of -11.31%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -3.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    57.66% -$0.54 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.82%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.52 which suggests that it could grow by 36.73%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than ARC Resources, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than ARC Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    2 2 0
  • Is AETUF or GTE More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.397, which suggesting that the stock is 60.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.709, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.147%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or GTE?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $170.5M. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.90x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.89x versus 0.25x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.89x 12.90x $1.2B $281.4M
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    0.25x 44.59x $170.5M -$19.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or SUNYF?

    Sunshine Oilsands has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of -9.69%. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Sunshine Oilsands's return on equity of -43.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    -28.82% -$0.02 $308.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.82%. On the other hand Sunshine Oilsands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Sunshine Oilsands, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Sunshine Oilsands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or SUNYF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.397, which suggesting that the stock is 60.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunshine Oilsands has a beta of -4,504.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 450547.875%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Sunshine Oilsands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunshine Oilsands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or SUNYF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Sunshine Oilsands quarterly revenues of $3.8M. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Sunshine Oilsands's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.90x while Sunshine Oilsands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.89x versus 0.50x for Sunshine Oilsands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.89x 12.90x $1.2B $281.4M
    SUNYF
    Sunshine Oilsands
    0.50x -- $3.8M -$6.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AETUF or ZENAF?

    Zenith Energy has a net margin of 22.54% compared to ARC Resources's net margin of --. ARC Resources's return on equity of 17.14% beat Zenith Energy's return on equity of -44.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    55.01% $0.48 $6.4B
    ZENAF
    Zenith Energy
    -- -- $75.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About AETUF or ZENAF?

    ARC Resources has a consensus price target of $26.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.82%. On the other hand Zenith Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ARC Resources has higher upside potential than Zenith Energy, analysts believe ARC Resources is more attractive than Zenith Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    9 0 0
    ZENAF
    Zenith Energy
    0 0 0
  • Is AETUF or ZENAF More Risky?

    ARC Resources has a beta of 0.397, which suggesting that the stock is 60.328% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zenith Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AETUF or ZENAF?

    ARC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Zenith Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ARC Resources pays 36.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Zenith Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ARC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AETUF or ZENAF?

    ARC Resources quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Zenith Energy quarterly revenues of --. ARC Resources's net income of $281.4M is higher than Zenith Energy's net income of --. Notably, ARC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.90x while Zenith Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ARC Resources is 2.89x versus 55.74x for Zenith Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AETUF
    ARC Resources
    2.89x 12.90x $1.2B $281.4M
    ZENAF
    Zenith Energy
    55.74x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Best AI Index Fund to Buy
Best AI Index Fund to Buy

Over the last two years, companies with a focus on…

Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?

Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…

2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31

Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock