YMM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JinkoSolar Holding has a net margin of 46.99% compared to Full Truck Alliance's net margin of -9.53%. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 10.13% beat JinkoSolar Holding's return on equity of -5.5%.

Full Truck Alliance has a consensus price target of $15.23, signalling upside risk potential of 30.65%. On the other hand JinkoSolar Holding has an analysts' consensus of $31.16 which suggests that it could grow by 54.4%. Given that JinkoSolar Holding has higher upside potential than Full Truck Alliance, analysts believe JinkoSolar Holding is more attractive than Full Truck Alliance.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JinkoSolar Holding has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.2%.

Full Truck Alliance has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. JinkoSolar Holding offers a yield of 14.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Full Truck Alliance pays 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. JinkoSolar Holding pays out 1004.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but JinkoSolar Holding's is not.

Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues are $371.1M, which are smaller than JinkoSolar Holding quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Full Truck Alliance's net income of $174.4M is higher than JinkoSolar Holding's net income of -$181.3M. Notably, Full Truck Alliance's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.36x while JinkoSolar Holding's PE ratio is 34.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full Truck Alliance is 7.53x versus 0.09x for JinkoSolar Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Labs has a net margin of 46.99% compared to Full Truck Alliance's net margin of --. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 10.13% beat Nano Labs's return on equity of -148.42%.

Full Truck Alliance has a consensus price target of $15.23, signalling upside risk potential of 30.65%. On the other hand Nano Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Nano Labs, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Nano Labs.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Labs has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Full Truck Alliance has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Nano Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full Truck Alliance pays 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues are $371.1M, which are larger than Nano Labs quarterly revenues of --. Full Truck Alliance's net income of $174.4M is higher than Nano Labs's net income of --. Notably, Full Truck Alliance's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.36x while Nano Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full Truck Alliance is 7.53x versus 15.52x for Nano Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WildHorse Resource Development has a net margin of 46.99% compared to Full Truck Alliance's net margin of --. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 10.13% beat WildHorse Resource Development's return on equity of --.

Full Truck Alliance has a consensus price target of $15.23, signalling upside risk potential of 30.65%. On the other hand WildHorse Resource Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than WildHorse Resource Development, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than WildHorse Resource Development.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WildHorse Resource Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Full Truck Alliance has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. WildHorse Resource Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full Truck Alliance pays 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. WildHorse Resource Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues are $371.1M, which are larger than WildHorse Resource Development quarterly revenues of --. Full Truck Alliance's net income of $174.4M is higher than WildHorse Resource Development's net income of --. Notably, Full Truck Alliance's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.36x while WildHorse Resource Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full Truck Alliance is 7.53x versus -- for WildHorse Resource Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.