NA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JinkoSolar Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Labs's net margin of -9.53%. Nano Labs's return on equity of -148.42% beat JinkoSolar Holding's return on equity of -5.5%.

Nano Labs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JinkoSolar Holding has an analysts' consensus of $31.16 which suggests that it could grow by 50.74%. Given that JinkoSolar Holding has higher upside potential than Nano Labs, analysts believe JinkoSolar Holding is more attractive than Nano Labs.

Nano Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JinkoSolar Holding has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.2%.

Nano Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JinkoSolar Holding offers a yield of 14.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Nano Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JinkoSolar Holding pays out 1004.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Labs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JinkoSolar Holding quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Nano Labs's net income of -- is lower than JinkoSolar Holding's net income of -$181.3M. Notably, Nano Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JinkoSolar Holding's PE ratio is 34.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Labs is 16.34x versus 0.09x for JinkoSolar Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WildHorse Resource Development has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Labs's net margin of --. Nano Labs's return on equity of -148.42% beat WildHorse Resource Development's return on equity of --.

Nano Labs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WildHorse Resource Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Labs has higher upside potential than WildHorse Resource Development, analysts believe Nano Labs is more attractive than WildHorse Resource Development.

Nano Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WildHorse Resource Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WildHorse Resource Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WildHorse Resource Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Labs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WildHorse Resource Development quarterly revenues of --. Nano Labs's net income of -- is lower than WildHorse Resource Development's net income of --. Notably, Nano Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WildHorse Resource Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Labs is 16.34x versus -- for WildHorse Resource Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Labs's net margin of 46.99%. Nano Labs's return on equity of -148.42% beat Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 10.13%.

Nano Labs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Full Truck Alliance has an analysts' consensus of $15.23 which suggests that it could grow by 26.22%. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Nano Labs, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Nano Labs.

Nano Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full Truck Alliance offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nano Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance pays out 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nano Labs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues of $371.1M. Nano Labs's net income of -- is lower than Full Truck Alliance's net income of $174.4M. Notably, Nano Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Full Truck Alliance's PE ratio is 24.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Labs is 16.34x versus 7.79x for Full Truck Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.