WDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Karoon Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 10% beat Karoon Energy's return on equity of --.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.99%. On the other hand Karoon Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Karoon Energy, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Karoon Energy.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Karoon Energy has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.128%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Karoon Energy offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Karoon Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodside Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Karoon Energy quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Karoon Energy's net income of --. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while Karoon Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.41x versus 0.98x for Karoon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of 6.9%. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 10% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 7.3%.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.99%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $77.51 which suggests that it could grow by 8.51%. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Shell PLC.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.199%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $69.2B. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Shell PLC's net income of $4.8B. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 16.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.41x versus 0.81x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Santos has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 10% beat Santos's return on equity of 7.9%.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.99%. On the other hand Santos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Santos, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Santos.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Santos has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.473%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Santos offers a yield of 4.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Santos pays out 80.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Santos quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Santos's net income of --. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while Santos's PE ratio is 13.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.41x versus 3.00x for Santos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tamboran Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 10% beat Tamboran Resources's return on equity of --.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.99%. On the other hand Tamboran Resources has an analysts' consensus of $38.67 which suggests that it could grow by 68.41%. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Tamboran Resources, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Tamboran Resources.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tamboran Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Tamboran Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Tamboran Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodside Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tamboran Resources quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Tamboran Resources's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while Tamboran Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.41x versus -- for Tamboran Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.