CEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NRG Energy has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 8.74%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 23.62% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $292.76, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.13 which suggests that it could fall by -4.44%. Given that Constellation Energy has more downside risk than NRG Energy, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.471%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Constellation Energy's net income of $118M is lower than NRG Energy's net income of $750M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 25.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 4.01x versus 1.11x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oklo has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of --. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 23.62% beat Oklo's return on equity of --.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $292.76, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand Oklo has an analysts' consensus of $54.04 which suggests that it could fall by -2.17%. Given that Constellation Energy has more downside risk than Oklo, analysts believe Oklo is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oklo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Oklo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Oklo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Oklo quarterly revenues of --. Constellation Energy's net income of $118M is higher than Oklo's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Oklo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 4.01x versus -- for Oklo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of -21.4%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 23.62% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 30.01%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $292.76, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $257.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.47%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $631M. Constellation Energy's net income of $118M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of -$135M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 25.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 4.01x versus 6.19x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of -6.81%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 23.62% beat Vistra's return on equity of 36.03%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $292.76, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $166.97 which suggests that it could grow by 2.84%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.258%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Constellation Energy's net income of $118M is higher than Vistra's net income of -$268M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.46x while Vistra's PE ratio is 25.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 4.01x versus 3.12x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.