VRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Plug Power has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -147.12%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $118.05, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 69.39%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.648%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.70x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.35x versus 1.46x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of -9.07%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $118.05, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -23.73%. Given that Vertiv Holdings has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Vertiv Holdings is more attractive than Tecogen.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.852%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.70x while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.35x versus 6.19x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thermon Group Holdings has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 12.66%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 11.03%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $118.05, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand Thermon Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.55%. Given that Thermon Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Thermon Group Holdings is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.64%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Thermon Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Thermon Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $134.1M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $17M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.70x while Thermon Group Holdings's PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.35x versus 1.86x for Thermon Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Vertiv Holdings's net margin of 3.68%. Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96%.

Vertiv Holdings has a consensus price target of $118.05, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 72.2%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.727, which suggesting that the stock is 72.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.869%.

Vertiv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vertiv Holdings pays 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M is higher than Ultralife's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Vertiv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.70x while Ultralife's PE ratio is 25.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vertiv Holdings is 5.35x versus 0.79x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.