ULBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Energy Industries has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of 6.11%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Advanced Energy Industries's return on equity of 6.24%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand Advanced Energy Industries has an analysts' consensus of $125.80 which suggests that it could fall by -0.7%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Advanced Energy Industries, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Advanced Energy Industries.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Energy Industries has a beta of 1.497, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.714%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Energy Industries offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries pays out 28.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are smaller than Advanced Energy Industries quarterly revenues of $404.6M. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is lower than Advanced Energy Industries's net income of $24.7M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.28x while Advanced Energy Industries's PE ratio is 65.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.72x versus 3.08x for Advanced Energy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ideal Power has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -22519.57%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -55.02%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could fall by -14.11%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Ideal Power, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Ideal Power.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.507%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $12K. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is higher than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.28x while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.72x versus 480.97x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -147.12%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 33.79%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Plug Power.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.648%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.28x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.72x versus 1.85x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Ultralife's net margin of -9.07%. Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16%.

Ultralife has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.23%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Tecogen.

Ultralife has a beta of 0.901, which suggesting that the stock is 9.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.852%.

Ultralife has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultralife pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ultralife quarterly revenues are $50.7M, which are larger than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Ultralife's net income of $1.9M is higher than Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K. Notably, Ultralife's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.28x while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultralife is 0.72x versus 6.40x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.