Where Will The Trade Desk’s Stock Be in 5 Years?
If you stitched together every advertisement The Trade Desk (NASDAQ:…
Buy
81
USFD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$76.23
Seasonality move
:
-1.37%
Day range:
$75.54 - $76.67
52-week range:
$50.05 - $79.64
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
35.17x
P/S ratio:
0.48x
P/B ratio:
3.84x
Volume:
1.8M
Avg. volume:
2.2M
1-year change:
43.96%
Market cap:
$17.7B
Revenue:
$37.9B
EPS (TTM):
$2.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
$9.4B | $0.69 | 4.75% | 40.53% | $85.39 |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
$296.2M | $0.06 | -1.13% | -14.71% | $17.00 |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
$192.8M | $0.53 | 8.69% | 56.86% | $35.00 |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
$2.9B | $0.43 | 2.5% | 47.06% | $20.50 |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
$20B | $1.02 | 2.22% | 12.68% | $79.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
$76.66 | $85.39 | $17.7B | 35.17x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.48x |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
$12.14 | $17.00 | $857.3M | 24.28x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.62x |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
$27.68 | $35.00 | $493.7M | 47.72x | $0.20 | 2.53% | 0.71x |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
$102.98 | -- | $66.5M | 41.36x | $0.18 | 0.7% | 0.02x |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
$18.21 | $20.50 | $616.4M | 15.77x | $0.22 | 4.79% | 0.06x |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
$75.39 | $79.78 | $36.5B | 19.53x | $0.51 | 2.71% | 0.46x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
52.05% | 1.972 | 33.1% | 0.69x |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
21.17% | 0.920 | 19.22% | 1.13x |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
-- | -0.270 | -- | 1.32x |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
59.18% | 1.070 | 213.19% | 0.72x |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
51.24% | -0.511 | 113.31% | 0.73x |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
87.51% | 0.227 | 37% | 0.72x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
USFD
US Foods Holding
|
$1.6B | $229M | 5.43% | 11.17% | 2.41% | $307M |
|
AVO
Mission Produce
|
$28.4M | $6.9M | 5.19% | 6.47% | 1.89% | -$25M |
|
CVGW
Calavo Growers
|
$18.1M | $7.6M | 4.67% | 5.08% | 5.23% | $15.6M |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
$43M | $461.9K | 0.55% | 1.34% | 0.04% | $31.4M |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
$481.5M | $22.4M | -0.73% | -1.38% | 0.66% | -$5.8M |
|
SYY
Sysco
|
$3.6B | $681M | 13.1% | 93.26% | 3.43% | $620M |
US Foods Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or AVO?
Mission Produce has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 0.82%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B AVOMission Produce7.47% $0.04 $732.6M -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or AVO?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.39%. On the other hand Mission Produce has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.03%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than US Foods Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 AVOMission Produce2 0 0 -
Is USFD or AVO More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or AVO?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mission Produce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mission Produce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or AVO?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Mission Produce quarterly revenues of $380.3M. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than Mission Produce's net income of $3.1M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.17x while Mission Produce's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.48x versus 0.62x for Mission Produce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.48x 35.17x $9.4B $115M AVOMission Produce0.62x 24.28x $380.3M $3.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or CVGW?
Calavo Growers has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 3.6%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Calavo Growers's return on equity of 5.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B CVGWCalavo Growers9.49% $0.38 $206.6M -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or CVGW?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.39%. On the other hand Calavo Growers has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.45%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than US Foods Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 CVGWCalavo Growers2 0 0 -
Is USFD or CVGW More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.103%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or CVGW?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calavo Growers offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out -829.09% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or CVGW?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Calavo Growers quarterly revenues of $190.5M. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than Calavo Growers's net income of $6.9M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.17x while Calavo Growers's PE ratio is 47.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.48x versus 0.71x for Calavo Growers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.48x 35.17x $9.4B $115M CVGWCalavo Growers0.71x 47.72x $190.5M $6.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or DIT?
Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of -0.26%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B DITAmcon Distributing6.95% -$2.58 $272.8M -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or DIT?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.39%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 DITAmcon Distributing0 0 0 -
Is USFD or DIT More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.226%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or DIT?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or DIT?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.17x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 41.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.48x versus 0.02x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.48x 35.17x $9.4B $115M DITAmcon Distributing0.02x 41.36x $619.5M -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or SPTN?
SpartanNash has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 0.07%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of -1.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B SPTNSpartanNash16.55% $0.06 $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or SPTN?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.39%. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.58%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than US Foods Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 SPTNSpartanNash0 4 0 -
Is USFD or SPTN More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.343, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.688%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or SPTN?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or SPTN?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.9B. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is higher than SpartanNash's net income of $2.1M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.17x while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.48x versus 0.06x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.48x 35.17x $9.4B $115M SPTNSpartanNash0.06x 15.77x $2.9B $2.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns USFD or SYY?
Sysco has a net margin of 1.23% compared to US Foods Holding's net margin of 2.05%. US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17% beat Sysco's return on equity of 93.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital USFDUS Foods Holding17.26% $0.49 $9.6B SYYSysco18.27% $0.82 $15.4B -
What do Analysts Say About USFD or SYY?
US Foods Holding has a consensus price target of $85.39, signalling upside risk potential of 11.39%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $79.78 which suggests that it could grow by 5.82%. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than Sysco.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings USFDUS Foods Holding10 2 0 SYYSysco7 9 0 -
Is USFD or SYY More Risky?
US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.445, which suggesting that the stock is 44.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.809, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.059%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock USFD or SYY?
US Foods Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. US Foods Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios USFD or SYY?
US Foods Holding quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $19.6B. US Foods Holding's net income of $115M is lower than Sysco's net income of $401M. Notably, US Foods Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.17x while Sysco's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Foods Holding is 0.48x versus 0.46x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income USFDUS Foods Holding0.48x 35.17x $9.4B $115M SYYSysco0.46x 19.53x $19.6B $401M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is MSTR Stock Fundamentally Misunderstood?
Software firm turned Bitcoin treasury Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) has made waves…
Is Alphabet or Amazon the Better Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) are two of the mega-cap…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
20
KARO alert for Jun 13
Karooooo [KARO] is up 1.28% over the past day.
Sell
18
OXM alert for Jun 13
Oxford Industries [OXM] is down 4.64% over the past day.
Sell
46
CRMT alert for Jun 13
America's Car-Mart [CRMT] is up 0.38% over the past day.
