SG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 13.45%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 43.78%.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 84.8%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $57.77 which suggests that it could grow by 15.36%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Chipotle Mexican Grill, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.418%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $386.6M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 44.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.26x versus 5.98x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shake Shack has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 1.32%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat Shake Shack's return on equity of 2.56%.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 84.8%. On the other hand Shake Shack has an analysts' consensus of $113.95 which suggests that it could fall by -12.2%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Shake Shack, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Shake Shack.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shake Shack has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.908%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shake Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shake Shack pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Shake Shack quarterly revenues of $320.9M. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than Shake Shack's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shake Shack's PE ratio is 463.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.26x versus 4.24x for Shake Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 53.93%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 84.8%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $320.73 which suggests that it could fall by -6.14%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Wingstop.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.797, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.689%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $171.1M. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wingstop's PE ratio is 57.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.26x versus 15.29x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 14.16%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 84.8%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $158.39 which suggests that it could grow by 10.04%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.641%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 28.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.26x versus 5.29x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.