SG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 13.45%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 43.78%.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $23.27, signalling upside risk potential of 85%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $57.69 which suggests that it could grow by 14.82%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Chipotle Mexican Grill, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.954%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $386.6M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 44.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.12x versus 6.00x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McDonald's has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 31.37%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat McDonald's's return on equity of --.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $23.27, signalling upside risk potential of 85%. On the other hand McDonald's has an analysts' consensus of $328.75 which suggests that it could grow by 8.89%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than McDonald's, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than McDonald's.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.455%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McDonald's offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's pays out 59.22% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than McDonald's quarterly revenues of $6B. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than McDonald's's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McDonald's's PE ratio is 26.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.12x versus 8.46x for McDonald's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 53.93%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $23.27, signalling upside risk potential of 85%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $334.73 which suggests that it could fall by -6.62%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Wingstop.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.866%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $171.1M. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wingstop's PE ratio is 60.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.12x versus 16.04x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of -15.06% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 14.16%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $23.27, signalling upside risk potential of 85%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $159.64 which suggests that it could grow by 10.88%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.185%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $166.3M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 28.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 2.12x versus 5.29x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.