RY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 28.01% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 31.58%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 13.53% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $105.50, signalling downside risk potential of -7.06%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that Bar Harbor Bankshares has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Bar Harbor Bankshares is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.497%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11B, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.1B is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.62x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 4.04x versus 3.16x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 28.01% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 16.32%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 13.53% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $105.50, signalling downside risk potential of -7.06%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11B, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.1B is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.62x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 4.04x versus 2.92x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 28.01% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 27.77%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 13.53% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $105.50, signalling downside risk potential of -7.06%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.81%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Park National offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11B, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.1B is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.62x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 4.04x versus 5.75x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 28.01% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 24.66%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 13.53% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $105.50, signalling downside risk potential of -7.06%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.93%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.711% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.046%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Bank of Canada's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11B, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.1B is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.62x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 4.04x versus 3.41x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.