RVLV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carvana has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Revolve Group's net margin of 5.1%. Revolve Group's return on equity of 11.98% beat Carvana's return on equity of 61.46%.

Revolve Group has a consensus price target of $22.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand Carvana has an analysts' consensus of $297.71 which suggests that it could fall by -6.66%. Given that Revolve Group has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Revolve Group is more attractive than Carvana.

Revolve Group has a beta of 2.020, which suggesting that the stock is 101.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carvana has a beta of 3.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 264.914%.

Revolve Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carvana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Revolve Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carvana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Revolve Group quarterly revenues are $296.7M, which are smaller than Carvana quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Revolve Group's net income of $11.8M is lower than Carvana's net income of $216M. Notably, Revolve Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while Carvana's PE ratio is 111.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Revolve Group is 1.30x versus 2.93x for Carvana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Revolve Group's net margin of 9.61%. Revolve Group's return on equity of 11.98% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 39.39%.

Revolve Group has a consensus price target of $22.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $150.22 which suggests that it could grow by 12.04%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Revolve Group, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Revolve Group.

Revolve Group has a beta of 2.020, which suggesting that the stock is 101.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.338%.

Revolve Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Revolve Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Revolve Group quarterly revenues are $296.7M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5B. Revolve Group's net income of $11.8M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $479.2M. Notably, Revolve Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Revolve Group is 1.30x versus 2.07x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Revolve Group's net margin of 10.71%. Revolve Group's return on equity of 11.98% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 50.14%.

Revolve Group has a consensus price target of $22.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $475.31 which suggests that it could grow by 2.79%. Given that Revolve Group has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Revolve Group is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Revolve Group has a beta of 2.020, which suggesting that the stock is 101.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.798%.

Revolve Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Revolve Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Revolve Group quarterly revenues are $296.7M, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Revolve Group's net income of $11.8M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $305.1M. Notably, Revolve Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 18.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Revolve Group is 1.30x versus 1.89x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Revolve Group's net margin of 8.15%. Revolve Group's return on equity of 11.98% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26%.

Revolve Group has a consensus price target of $22.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $71.37 which suggests that it could grow by 3.17%. Given that Revolve Group has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Revolve Group is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Revolve Group has a beta of 2.020, which suggesting that the stock is 101.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.682%.

Revolve Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Revolve Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Revolve Group quarterly revenues are $296.7M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Revolve Group's net income of $11.8M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M. Notably, Revolve Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 14.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Revolve Group is 1.30x versus 1.15x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.