URBN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 7.33%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 43.48%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $73.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $113.37 which suggests that it could grow by 21.29%. Given that Abercrombie & Fitch has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Abercrombie & Fitch is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.53%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is higher than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $80.4M. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 9.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.19x versus 0.97x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Buckle has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 12.93%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat Buckle's return on equity of 43.52%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $73.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Buckle has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could fall by -16.74%. Given that Urban Outfitters has higher upside potential than Buckle, analysts believe Urban Outfitters is more attractive than Buckle.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Buckle has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.062%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Buckle offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Buckle pays out 101.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Buckle quarterly revenues of $272.1M. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is higher than Buckle's net income of $35.2M. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while Buckle's PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.19x versus 1.97x for Buckle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gap has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 5.57%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat Gap's return on equity of 28.67%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $73.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Gap has an analysts' consensus of $26.61 which suggests that it could grow by 31.8%. Given that Gap has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Gap is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gap has a beta of 2.149, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.938%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gap offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap pays out 26.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Gap's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Gap quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is lower than Gap's net income of $193M. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while Gap's PE ratio is 8.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.19x versus 0.51x for Gap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 9.61%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 39.39%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $73.15, signalling upside risk potential of 1.4%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $151.01 which suggests that it could grow by 16.22%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.014%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5B. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $479.2M. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.09x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.19x versus 2.01x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.