ROL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dream Finders Homes has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Rollins's net margin of 5.55%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.24% beat Dream Finders Homes's return on equity of 25.61%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $54.83, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand Dream Finders Homes has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.52%. Given that Dream Finders Homes has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Dream Finders Homes is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dream Finders Homes has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Dream Finders Homes offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Dream Finders Homes pays out 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $822.5M, which are smaller than Dream Finders Homes quarterly revenues of $989.9M. Rollins's net income of $105.2M is higher than Dream Finders Homes's net income of $54.9M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Dream Finders Homes's PE ratio is 7.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.85x versus 0.53x for Dream Finders Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Rollins's net margin of -6.69%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.24% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 48.92%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $54.83, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $188.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.58%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.39%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $822.5M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Rollins's net income of $105.2M is higher than Expedia Group's net income of -$200M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.85x versus 1.62x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Rollins's net margin of 0.65%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.24% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $54.83, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.38%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.634%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $822.5M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $179.7M. Rollins's net income of $105.2M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.85x versus 0.93x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Rollins's net margin of -2.76%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.24% beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 6.29%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $54.83, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $16.88 which suggests that it could grow by 35%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.054%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $822.5M, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $398M. Rollins's net income of $105.2M is higher than Tripadvisor's net income of -$11M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.71x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 33.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.85x versus 0.98x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.