QUAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of -8.6%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -23.84% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $9.45, signalling upside risk potential of 69.96%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.94%. Given that Quad/Graphics has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Quad/Graphics is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.201%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -18.47% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Quad/Graphics's net income of $5.8M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 24.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.10x versus 0.57x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of 16.54%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -23.84% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 16.58%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $9.45, signalling upside risk potential of 69.96%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -49.37%. Given that Quad/Graphics has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Quad/Graphics is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.134, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.6%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -18.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Quad/Graphics's net income of $5.8M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 18.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.10x versus 2.85x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flowserve has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of 6.46%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -23.84% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $9.45, signalling upside risk potential of 69.96%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $63.80 which suggests that it could grow by 21.16%. Given that Quad/Graphics has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe Quad/Graphics is more attractive than Flowserve.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.968%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -18.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Quad/Graphics's net income of $5.8M is lower than Flowserve's net income of $73.9M. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flowserve's PE ratio is 24.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.10x versus 1.51x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 0.92% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of -16.81%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -23.84% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $9.45, signalling upside risk potential of 69.96%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49528300.95%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Quad/Graphics, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Quad/Graphics.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.375%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -18.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. Quad/Graphics's net income of $5.8M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.10x versus 0.02x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.