PERF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 15.7% compared to Perfect's net margin of 5.86%. Perfect's return on equity of 3.53% beat Himax Technologies's return on equity of 9.08%.

Perfect has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.86%. On the other hand Himax Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.40 which suggests that it could grow by 33.99%. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than Himax Technologies, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than Himax Technologies.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.663%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Himax Technologies offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 165.7% of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are smaller than Himax Technologies quarterly revenues of $222.4M. Perfect's net income of $2.5M is lower than Himax Technologies's net income of $13M. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.63x while Himax Technologies's PE ratio is 18.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.98x versus 1.53x for Himax Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a net margin of 15.7% compared to Perfect's net margin of --. Perfect's return on equity of 3.53% beat ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's return on equity of 7.23%.

Perfect has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.86%. On the other hand ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a beta of 0.858, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.22%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES offers a yield of 5.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES pays out 85.01% of its earnings as a dividend. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are larger than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES quarterly revenues of --. Perfect's net income of $2.5M is higher than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's net income of --. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.63x while ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's PE ratio is 12.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.98x versus 1.04x for ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SemiLEDs has a net margin of 15.7% compared to Perfect's net margin of -24.11%. Perfect's return on equity of 3.53% beat SemiLEDs's return on equity of -119.88%.

Perfect has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.86%. On the other hand SemiLEDs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SemiLEDs has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.386%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SemiLEDs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SemiLEDs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are larger than SemiLEDs quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Perfect's net income of $2.5M is higher than SemiLEDs's net income of -$319K. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.63x while SemiLEDs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.98x versus 1.54x for SemiLEDs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Semilux International has a net margin of 15.7% compared to Perfect's net margin of --. Perfect's return on equity of 3.53% beat Semilux International's return on equity of --.

Perfect has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.86%. On the other hand Semilux International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than Semilux International.

Perfect has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Perfect has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Semilux International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perfect pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Semilux International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perfect quarterly revenues are $16.1M, which are larger than Semilux International quarterly revenues of --. Perfect's net income of $2.5M is higher than Semilux International's net income of --. Notably, Perfect's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.63x while Semilux International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perfect is 3.98x versus -- for Semilux International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.