LEDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AXT has a net margin of 1.26% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of -45.45%. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -17.49% beat AXT's return on equity of -7.08%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of $3.96 which suggests that it could grow by 70.69%. Given that AXT has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe AXT is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.197%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $17.7M, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $19.4M. SemiLEDs's net income of $223K is higher than AXT's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 0.61x versus 1.05x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entegris has a net margin of 1.26% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of 8.14%. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -17.49% beat Entegris's return on equity of 8.64%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of $98.20 which suggests that it could grow by 13.88%. Given that Entegris has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe Entegris is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 20.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $17.7M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $773.2M. SemiLEDs's net income of $223K is lower than Entegris's net income of $62.9M. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Entegris's PE ratio is 42.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 0.61x versus 4.04x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FIT Hon Teng has a net margin of 1.26% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of --. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -17.49% beat FIT Hon Teng's return on equity of 6.31%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FIT Hon Teng has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SemiLEDs has higher upside potential than FIT Hon Teng, analysts believe SemiLEDs is more attractive than FIT Hon Teng.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FIT Hon Teng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FIT Hon Teng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FIT Hon Teng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $17.7M, which are larger than FIT Hon Teng quarterly revenues of --. SemiLEDs's net income of $223K is higher than FIT Hon Teng's net income of --. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FIT Hon Teng's PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 0.61x versus 0.51x for FIT Hon Teng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of 1.26% compared to SemiLEDs's net margin of -8.74%. SemiLEDs's return on equity of -17.49% beat inTest's return on equity of -0.1%.

SemiLEDs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.47%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

SemiLEDs has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.54%.

SemiLEDs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SemiLEDs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SemiLEDs quarterly revenues are $17.7M, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. SemiLEDs's net income of $223K is higher than inTest's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, SemiLEDs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SemiLEDs is 0.61x versus 0.68x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.