OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 9.53%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $108.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.58%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.23 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.689%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.62x versus 1.60x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 6.79%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $108.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.58%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $101.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.626%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $505.1M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 14.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.62x versus 1.53x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -0.7%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of 0.18%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $108.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.58%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.76%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.927, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.705%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $204.6M. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is 1,049.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.62x versus 0.46x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -173.26%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17% beat Xos's return on equity of -104.41%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $108.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.58%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 81.27%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.60x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.62x versus 0.54x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.